COMMENT & RESPONSEIn Reply We appreciate Dr Hu's interest in and thoughtful criticism of our clinical trial. 1 We agree that it will be challenging to get Xuebijing approved outside of China, but that the obstacles are surmountable. 2 Our randomized clinical trial 1 was carried out based on numerous early-stage scientific and pharmacological research projects. Xuebijing injection is created by combining traditional Chinese medicine with a number of different chemical compounds. The main components and pharmacokinetics of Xuebijing injection have been basically described. 3 Preliminary preclinical studies have confirmed that Xuebijing injection has an antiseptic mechanism that includes anti-inflammatory, endothelial cell protection, regulating immune, and coagulation functions. 4 A recent study 5 showed that the main components of Xuebijing injection and antibiotics (etiologic treatment of patients with sepsis) worked very well together in terms of pharmacokinetic compatibility while treating sepsis. However, what remains unclear is which components of Xuebijing injection produced which effects and through which specific signal pathways. Regarding quality control, another study 3 found very small batch-to-batch variability in the contents of the marker constituents of the main components of Xuebijing injection.We do not think that drug equivalence or noninferiority trials are the next step because our study 1 allowed for antibiotics and optimal sepsis management (eg, fluid resuscitation), and there is no well-accepted adjuvant treatment for sepsis. However, we do agree with Dr Hu that a large randomized clinical trial outside of China would be the best pathway to demonstrate the value of Xuebijing injection use in the rest of the world.