Effect of an Educational Intervention on Therapeutic Inertia in Neurologists With Expertise in Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

IMPORTANCETherapeutic inertia (TI) is the failure to escalate therapy when treatment goals are unmet and is associated with low tolerance to uncertainty and aversion to ambiguity in physician decision-making. Limited information is available on how physicians handle therapeutic decisionmaking in the context of uncertainty. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether an educational intervention decreases TI by reducing autonomic arousal response (pupil dilation), a proxy measure of how physicians respond to uncertainty during treatment decisions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this randomized clinical trial, 34 neurologists with expertise in multiple sclerosis (MS) practicing at 15 outpatient MS clinics in academic and community institutions from across Canada were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an educational intervention that facilitates treatment decisions (active group) or to receive no exposure to the intervention (usual care [control group]) from December 2017 to March 2018. Participants listened to 20 audio-recorded simulated case scenarios as pupil responses were assessed by eye trackers. Autonomic arousal was assessed as pupil dilation in periods in which critical information was provided (first period [T1]: clinical data, second period [T2]: neurologic status, and third period [T3]: magnetic resonance imaging data). Data were analyzed from September 2018 to March 2020. INTERVENTIONS The traffic light system (TLS)-based educational intervention vs usual care (unexposed). The TLS (use of established associations between traffic light colors and actions to stop or proceed) assists participants in identifying factors associated with worse prognosis in MS care, thereby facilitating the treatment decision-making process by use of established associations between red, green, and yellow colors and risk levels, and actions (treatment decisions). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPupil assessment was the primary autonomic outcome. To test the treatment effect of the educational intervention (TLS), difference-in-differences models (also called untreated control group design with pretest and posttest) were used. RESULTSOf 38 eligible participants, 34 (89.4%) neurologists completed the study. The mean (SD) age was 44.6 (11.6) years; 38.3% were female and 20 (58.8%) were MS specialists. Therapeutic inertia was present in 50.0% (17 of 34) of all participants and was associated with greater pupil dilation. For every additional SD of pupil dilation, the odds of TI increased by 51% for T1 (odds ratio, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.12-2.03), by 31% for T2 (odds ratio, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08-1.59), and by 49% for T3 (odds ratio, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.13-1.97). The intervention significantly reduced TI (risk reduction, 31.5%; 95% CI, (continued) Key Points Question How do physicians handle uncertainty when making live therapeutic decisions? Findings In this randomized clinical trial of 34 neurologists from Canada, an educational intervention showed a significant 31% reduction in therapeutic inertia compared with the control group. Pupil d...

Functional Coupling of the Locus Coeruleus Is Linked to Successful Cognitive Control

“…This example, and the current data, therefore showcase how hypotheses derived from animal neurophysiology can inform human studies to test the functional and behavioral relevance of the neural arousal circuits [42]. The combination of novel connectivity methods [106][107][108][109] with behavioral tasks that drive the LC-NE [110][111][112][113][114], as well as the use of indirect measures of LC-NE activity such as pupil dilation and heart-rate variability [114][115][116][117], hold great promise to further our understanding of the LC-NE arousal system and its contribution to various psychopathologies [118][119][120].…”

Regret and Therapeutic Decisions in Multiple Sclerosis Care: Literature Review and Research Protocol

“…The higher the number of choices or difficulty making decisions faced by physicians, the higher the degree of regret ( 36 ). The promotion of evidence-based reflective reasoning or the use of effective interventions in medical education may be useful to ameliorate care-related regret and its impact on diagnostic and treatment decisions ( 55 , 56 ).…”

Decision making under uncertainty in the diagnosis and management of Alzheimer's Disease in primary care: A study protocol applying concepts from neuroeconomics

“…This protocol constitutes the initial step to understand the current factors influencing the diagnosis and management of AD in primary care. Our results will serve to create and subsequently assess an educational intervention in a randomized study as previously done by our team ( 35 , 48 ).…”

“…Neuroeconomics is the science that studies the principles of how we make decisions ( 32 , 33 ). It is based on concepts from behavioral economics, advanced brain imaging and electrophysiological studies (e.g., magnetoencephalography, skin conductance test, pupillary variability as a marker of central arousal) and the application of mathematical algorithms ( 34 , 35 ).…”