2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2017.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of an edge at cup rim on contact stress during micro-separation in ceramic-on-ceramic hip joints

Abstract: Alumina ceramic total hip joint bearings have shown superior wear properties. The joint bearing may undergo adverse conditions such as micro-separation causing head contact on the cup rim. As a transition, an edge is formed between the cup bearing and the rim. The aim of this study was to predict the effect of the edge on contact stresses in order to better understand the mechanisms of wear. A finite element contact model was developed under the conditions of the head displacements 0.5–2 mm and vertical loads … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite over 100‐fold differences in wear rates between CoC and conventional PE hips, revision rates at 13 years for uncemented CoC (5.69%) and uncemented MoP (5.90%) procedures are currently very similar . The fact that ceramic wear particles may be fewer in number but more reactive than polyethylene cannot be an explanation, as “ceramic wear debris has shown to be less biologically active.” Furthermore, wear rates for retrieved third‐generation ceramic bearings reported in the literature range from 0.3 to 1.9 mm 3 /year, so they show relatively good agreement with hip simulator studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Despite over 100‐fold differences in wear rates between CoC and conventional PE hips, revision rates at 13 years for uncemented CoC (5.69%) and uncemented MoP (5.90%) procedures are currently very similar . The fact that ceramic wear particles may be fewer in number but more reactive than polyethylene cannot be an explanation, as “ceramic wear debris has shown to be less biologically active.” Furthermore, wear rates for retrieved third‐generation ceramic bearings reported in the literature range from 0.3 to 1.9 mm 3 /year, so they show relatively good agreement with hip simulator studies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Intriguingly, all of the three revision-related events were demonstrated, as no statistical difference in the two groups. Ceramic wear debris has shown to be less biologically active in laboratory studies ( 33 ). Therefore, the explanation that ceramic wear particles may be fewer in number, but more reactive than PE cannot be convincing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 Further, contact pressures of 20 MPa and 2.3 GPa was predicted under edge loading condition for MoP and CoC type implants, respectively. 11,12 Hence, the clinical outcome becomes inconsistence with the in vitro tests performed at normal walking contact pressure. 45 Therefore, edge loading conditions should be considered at the hip joint.…”
Section: Experiments Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10 Despite having sound tribo-performance of CoCrMo, it is not aptly suitable for long-term implant application, particularly, to improve the longevity of hip implants. Liu and Fisher 11 studied the simulated contact pressure for an edge at cup rim during micro-separation in ceramic-on-ceramic hip implant. A maximum contact stress of 2.3 GPa was found, which elevated the implant wear and damaged the ceramic bearing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%