Effect of an ecosystem-centered community participation programme on the incidence of dengue. A field randomized, controlled trial

Newton-Sánchez, Óscar Alberto; Ruiz, Miriam de la Cruz; Torres-Rojo, Yisel; Ochoa-Díaz-López, Héctor; Delgado‐Enciso, Iván; Hernandez-Suarez, Carlos; Espinoza‐Gómez, Francisco

doi:10.1007/s00038-020-01345-y

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Referring to previous research such as study on community participation models that were applied, namely Community based environmental health promotion program (CBEHPP) training in changing behavior to stop defecation, and training to local communities [ 12 , 13 ]. Other research focuses on education and infrastructure development [ 14 , 15 , 16 ]. The previous research still has not connected the relationship between resident status, gender role, stakeholder roles, infrastructure, socio-cultural, and socio-economic on behavior in community participation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavior model of community-based sanitation management in coastal areas: confirmatory factor analysis

Susilawati¹,

Harahap²,

Mulya³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Behavior model of community-based sanitation management in coastal areas: confirmatory factor analysis

Susilawati¹,

Harahap²,

Mulya³

et al. 2022

Heliyon

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…an increased house index in the intervention group) and an effect on clinical dengue case incidence favouring intervention (Lenhart et al, 2008;Toledo et al, 2017). In the remaining four studies, entomological and epidemiological endpoints concurred (Table 3), indicating an effect favouring the intervention (Lenhart et al, 2008;Andersson et al, 2015;Lenhart et al, 2020;Newton-Sánchez et al, 2020).…”

Section: Evaluation Of Epidemiological and Entomological Endpoints Of...mentioning

confidence: 92%

A systematic review to understand the value of entomological endpoints for assessing the efficacy of vector control interventions

Hul

Braks

Bortel

2021

EFS3

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To guide implementation of vector control interventions in Europe, a stronger evidence base of their efficacy and effectiveness is needed. Currently, epidemiological endpoints are used to demonstrate the public health value of a vector control intervention. This systematic literature review aimed to help assess whether entomological endpoints (such as mosquito abundance, infection rates, inoculation rates, parity rate as proxy for longevity, or others) can be used on their own as evidence of efficacy of vector control interventions against vector‐borne diseases. We searched electronic bibliographic databases (The Cochrane Library, CAB Abstracts, MEDLINE and Web of Science) for intervention trials where vector control interventions were evaluated and extracted epidemiological and entomological effect size estimates. The selection process resulted in 31 studies (extracted from 35 publications) for which both types of endpoints were available. The final database included studies on malaria (n=16), dengue (n=9), leishmaniasis (n=5) and tick‐borne diseases (n=1). Epidemiological and entomological effect sizes often pointed in the same direction (i.e. both favouring intervention or favouring control). However, based on the statistical inference (whether the effect size estimate is significantly different from no‐effect) of the results, we observed some disagreement between endpoints, though we rarely saw complete disagreement in effect estimates. This review illustrates the complex relation between entomological and epidemiological endpoints. Based on this review, it is concluded that evaluating interventions on entomological endpoints only is insufficient to understand their potential epidemiological impact. To better asses the value of entomological endpoints for the assessment of efficacy of vector control intervention, there is a need for studies to be powered for both epidemiological and entomological endpoints.

show abstract

“…The characteristics of the included studies are presented in S3-S5 Tables. Most studies from the Latin America region were from Brazil (n = 30) , Mexico (n = 21) [90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109]120] and Colombia (n = 18) [65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82] (Table 1). Most studies from the Caribbean region…”

Section: Characteristics Of the Included Publicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effectiveness of Aedes-borne infectious disease control in Latin America and the Caribbean region: A scoping review

Mulderij-Jansen

Pundir²,

Grillet³

et al. 2022

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus are primary vectors of emerging or re-emerging arboviruses that threaten public health worldwide. Many efforts have been made to develop interventions to control these Aedes species populations. Still, countries in the Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) region struggle to create/design/develop sustainable and effective control strategies. This scoping review synthesises evidence concerning the effectiveness of Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus prevention and control interventions performed in LAC (2000–2021). The findings can be used to evaluate, compare and develop more effective control strategies. Methodology The review is based on the methodology by Joanna Briggs Institute for conducting a scoping review. The MEDLINE (via PubMed and Web of Science), Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE and ScienceDirect databases were used to search for articles. Grey literature was searched from governmental and non-governmental organisation websites. Four reviewers independently screened all titles and abstracts and full-text of the articles using the Rayyan web application, based on pre-defined eligibility criteria. Results A total of 122 publications were included in the review. Most studies focused on dengue virus infection and data on Ae. aegypti. Entomological data were mainly used to determine the intervention’s effectiveness. An integrated control intervention was the most commonly employed strategy in both regions. Biological control measures, environmental management, and health education campaigns on community participation achieved more sustainable results than an intervention where only a chemical control measure was used. Challenges to implementing interventions were insufficient financial support, resources, workforce, intersectoral collaboration and legislation. Conclusions Based on the synthesised data, an integrated vector (Aedes) management focused on community participation seems to be the most effective approach to mitigate Aedes-borne infectious diseases. Maintaining the approach’s effect remains challenging as it requires multisectoral and multi-disciplinary team engagement and active community participation. Future research needs to address the barriers to program implementation and maintenance as data on this topic is lacking.

show abstract

Effect of an ecosystem-centered community participation programme on the incidence of dengue. A field randomized, controlled trial

Cited by 4 publications

References 20 publications

Behavior model of community-based sanitation management in coastal areas: confirmatory factor analysis

Behavior model of community-based sanitation management in coastal areas: confirmatory factor analysis

A systematic review to understand the value of entomological endpoints for assessing the efficacy of vector control interventions

Effectiveness of Aedes-borne infectious disease control in Latin America and the Caribbean region: A scoping review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About