2021
DOI: 10.3390/nu13082798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of an Antenatal Lifestyle Intervention on Dietary Inflammatory Index and Its Associations with Maternal and Fetal Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of the PEARS Trial

Abstract: We investigated the effect of an antenatal lifestyle intervention of a low-glycaemic index (GI) diet and physical activity on energy-adjusted dietary inflammatory index (E-DIITM) and explored its relationship with maternal and child health in women with overweight and obesity. This was a secondary analysis of 434 mother−child pairs from the Pregnancy Exercise and Nutrition Study (PEARS) trial in Dublin, Ireland. E-DIITM scores were calculated for early (10–16 weeks) and late (28 weeks) pregnancy. Outcomes incl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we did not find differences between neonatal LDL‐cholesterol and the degree of adherence to the MD diet during gestation. In agreement with our results, Killeen et al (2021) found no associations between the maternal inflammatory potential of the diet and triglycerides, HDL‐C, LDL‐C, total cholesterol and glucose in the cord blood. Furthermore, a maternal diet that promoted fish, low‐fat meats and dairy products, oils, whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and legumes decreased maternal cholesterol concentrations, but not cord and neonatal lipids or inflammatory markers (Khoury et al, 2005, 2007), which is in agreement with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we did not find differences between neonatal LDL‐cholesterol and the degree of adherence to the MD diet during gestation. In agreement with our results, Killeen et al (2021) found no associations between the maternal inflammatory potential of the diet and triglycerides, HDL‐C, LDL‐C, total cholesterol and glucose in the cord blood. Furthermore, a maternal diet that promoted fish, low‐fat meats and dairy products, oils, whole grains, fruits, vegetables, and legumes decreased maternal cholesterol concentrations, but not cord and neonatal lipids or inflammatory markers (Khoury et al, 2005, 2007), which is in agreement with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our findings of an association between MD adherence and maternal cardiometabolic markers throughout gestation were generally consistent with results from other studies (Asemi et al, 2013; Khoury et al, 2005; Martin et al, 2016). Previous randomized controlled trials (Asemi et al, 2013; Khoury et al, 2005; Killeen et al, 2021) and observational studies (Eshriqui et al, 2020; Martin et al, 2016) found an association between healthier maternal dietary patterns and lower total cholesterol, higher HDL‐C, lower LDL‐C, LDL‐C/HDL‐C ratio and triglycerides. Regarding MD adherence, pregnant women in the second trimester of pregnancy (22–26th g.w.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In our analysis, the maternal E-DII score was positively associated with PW. This is in contrast to findings from secondary analysis of the PEARS RCT ( n = 434) which showed no association between the E-DII score and PW ( 20 ). It should be noted that the PEARS trial comprised women with overweight and obesity, which represent only 24% of the Lifeways subsample, indicating potentially distinct placental inflammatory pathways depending on maternal BMI as previously suggested by Aye et al ( 54 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are no comparative studies conducted thus far which have examined the relationship between maternal dietary scores and placental outcomes in humans. In the one study available, secondary analysis of the PEARS RCT ( n = 434) showed no association between the E-DII score and placental weight ( 20 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…kg., Hamburg, Germany). Height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using a wall-mounted stadiometer after removal of footwear ( 31 ). Height at baseline and early pregnancy weight were used to calculate maternal BMI (kg/m²).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%