2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ambient NH3 levels on PM2.5 composition in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our ammonia results are similar to levels found in Rome (Perrino et al, 2002), as well as to a swine production facility in eastern North Carolina, USA (Baek et al, 2004). Agricultural (Robarge et al, 2002) and suburban (Hu et al, 2008) areas show slightly lower concentrations, while the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA (Olszyna et al, 2005) and the urban area of North Birmingham, USA show concentrations below 2 µg/m 3 (Edgerton et al, 2007). The concentrations of ammonia in Santiago are among the highest, due to the large number and variety of sources (mobile sources, wastewater treatment plants, agricultural activities in the southwestern part of the city, rivers and channels with loads of organic matter, and wetlands) and adverse geographical and meteorological conditions for dispersion of gases and particles.…”
Section: Ammonia Concentration Levelssupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our ammonia results are similar to levels found in Rome (Perrino et al, 2002), as well as to a swine production facility in eastern North Carolina, USA (Baek et al, 2004). Agricultural (Robarge et al, 2002) and suburban (Hu et al, 2008) areas show slightly lower concentrations, while the Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA (Olszyna et al, 2005) and the urban area of North Birmingham, USA show concentrations below 2 µg/m 3 (Edgerton et al, 2007). The concentrations of ammonia in Santiago are among the highest, due to the large number and variety of sources (mobile sources, wastewater treatment plants, agricultural activities in the southwestern part of the city, rivers and channels with loads of organic matter, and wetlands) and adverse geographical and meteorological conditions for dispersion of gases and particles.…”
Section: Ammonia Concentration Levelssupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Through reactions with acid pollutants to form ammonium nitrate (NH 4 NO 3 ), ammonium sulphates (NH 4 HSO 4 and [NH 4 ] 2 SO 4 ) and ammonium chloride (NH 4 Cl) (Walker et al, 2004;Olszyna et al, 2005;Morales and Leiva, 2006), ammonia (NH 3 ) is a main contributor to secondary particulate matter. Additionally, those particulates can significantly contribute to visibility impairment and regional haze.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to volatilization of NH 4 NO 3 , the equilibrium shifts towards the left with rise in temperature (Wang et al 2005). Olszyna et al 2005 observed that partial pressure products (Pr) of gas phase NH 3 and HNO 3 were 2-20 times below the threshold value for NH 4 NO 3 formation in PM 2.5 and 2-3 folds increase in NH 3 levels or 2°C drop in temperature was sufficient to produce NH 4 NO 3 aerosol. The present study shows that the concentrations of NH 4 + and NO 3 -gradually decreased from winter till monsoon.…”
Section: Secondary Ionic Speciesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Traditional techniques employ passive samplers such as annular diffusion denuders with off-line analysis such as ion chromatography (Hoek et al, 1996;Burkhardt et al, 1998;Matsumoto and Okita, 1998;Erisman et al, 2001;Olszyna et al, 2005;Smith et al, 2007). Drawbacks of these methods often include low time resolution, poor sensitivity, and human-induced errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%