Effect of aluminium oxide particle sandblasting on the artificial tooth–resin bond

Richter, Marina Martorano; Mesquita, Marcelo Ferraz; Sinhoreti, Mário Alexandre Coelho; Guiraldo, Ricardo Danil

doi:10.1111/j.2041-1626.2010.00027.x

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 31 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Datos semejantes fueron relatados en los estudios de El-Sheikh & Powers (14), Chung et al (15), Bragaglia et al (16) y Consani et al (10), en que los autores utilizaron diferentes tamaños de partículas de óxido de aluminio, entre 50 y 200μm y en algunos casos, tratamientos de superficie adicionales, verificando que la utilización de microarenador con partículas de óxido de aluminio demostró los mejores resultados de resistencia de unión entre dientes de resina acrílica y el material de reparación. Por otro lado, Geerts & Jooste (30) no observaron diferencias significativas comparando superficies con y sin tratamiento con microarenador, destacándose el hecho de que aplicaron una metodología diferente.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

“…Uno de los problemas más frecuentes en la práctica clínica es la fractura de las prótesis, generalmente en la interface entre la base acrílica y el diente artificial (6,7). Esta falla adhesiva (8,9) está íntimamente relacionada a la presencia de estrés excesivo durante la masticación, fatiga mecánica, caídas accidentales y también fallas de carácter laboratorial (10).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bond Strength Assessment Between Acrylic Teeth and Acrylic Resin Repairs: Effect of Different Surface Treatments

MSc

Reales

Prates³

et al. 2016

Odovtos - Int J Dent Sc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strength between acrylic resin teeth and autopolymerizing acrylic resin repairs after different surface treatments. Seventy-two upper anterior acrylic resin denture teeth (MFT, Vita, Germany) were selected. Specimens were randomly assigned into six groups (n=12): G1-C, without surface treatment (control); G2-M, methylmetacrylate monomer (Jet, Clássico, Brazil) application; G3-A treatment with methylmetacrylate and metiletilcetone-based bonding agent (Vitacoll, Vita, Germany). The surface of G4-OA, G5-OAM and G6-OAA was airborne-particle abraded with aluminum oxide (Polidental, Wilson, Brazil); being repeated the treatments respectively of groups G1-C, G2-M e G3-A. All groups were then repaired with autopolymerizing acrylic resin (Jet, Clássico, Brazil). Shear bond strength test was performed using an universal testing machine (Instron 4444). Two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s analysis (p<0,05) were used for statistical comparison. The shear bond strengths of groups G4-OA, G5-OAM and G6-OAA were significantly higher (p<0,05) than that of groups G1-C, G2-M and G3-A. The shear bond strength of Group G3-A were significantly higher (p<0,05) than that of groups G1-C and G2-M. In conclution, chemical treatments in combination with bondig agents showed significant improvements in bond strength without aluminum oxide treatment. More significantly, surface treatment with aluminum oxide particles resulted in the highest bond strength values for acrylic resin teeth repaired with autopolymerizing acrylic resin.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

Bond Strength Assessment Between Acrylic Teeth and Acrylic Resin Repairs: Effect of Different Surface Treatments

MSc

Reales

Prates³

et al. 2016

Odovtos - Int J Dent Sc

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Isolation with a dental dam provided control of the dental surface while the temporary cement was removed with ultrasound followed by pumicing with a brush so that the tooth surface was adequately cleaned [26,27] ( Figure 10). retention of the adhesive [28] (Figure 11).…”

Section: Treatment Of the Tooth Sidementioning

confidence: 99%

Optimization of the Bonding of Glass-Ceramics to Dental Structures: A Case Study

Felenc

Lethuillier

2014

JDODT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Glass-ceramic restoration of eroded teeth is becoming a routine therapeutic procedure. The glass-ceramic prosthesis is held in place by adhesive bonding, the strength of which is dependent on the materials and specific techniques employed. The clinical case study presented afforded the opportunity to optimize and fine tune the bonding procedure. Surface treatments of the different substrates (tooth and ceramic) have been developed so as to maximize the strength of the adhesive bond of ceramic to both underlying dentin and enamel. The success of the procedure is often evaluated by the time that the prosthesis remains in the oral cavity. This case demonstrates those three years after bonding, the restoration remains securely in place despite a severe accident resulting in a root fracture.

show abstract

“… Sandblasting with aluminum oxide particles of the prepared teeth surfaces in order to enhance the bond strength [16].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

New Tricks in the Preparation Design for Prosthetic Ceramic Laminate Veeners

Ortensi

Vitali²,

Bonfiglioli³

et al. 2019

Prosthesis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The prosthetic preparation of the teeth for ceramic laminate veneers has to follow the minimally invasive concept brought by the modern Conservative Dentistry and Prosthodontics. However, during the cementation phase under the rubber dam, the loss of the esthetics landmarks could lead to errors in the future positioning of the laminate veneers. Methods: In this article the authors show an accurate operative prosthetic protocol using different fine intraoperative maneuvers and tricks for the realization of ceramic laminates in order to solve the problems of the cementation phase. Results: The treatment of the anterior sector of the upper maxilla with porcelain laminate veneers was realized in a 30 years old woman with aesthetic issues. Conclusion: Different fine intraoperative maneuvers and tricks during teeth preparation, master impression and rubber dam positioning could reduce errors occurring in the cementation phase and increase the predictability of the results.

show abstract

Effect of aluminium oxide particle sandblasting on the artificial tooth–resin bond

Abstract: Sandblasting with different aluminium oxide particle sizes produced different effects on the shear strength values of the tooth-resin bond.

Cited by 7 publications

References 31 publications

Bond Strength Assessment Between Acrylic Teeth and Acrylic Resin Repairs: Effect of Different Surface Treatments

Bond Strength Assessment Between Acrylic Teeth and Acrylic Resin Repairs: Effect of Different Surface Treatments

Optimization of the Bonding of Glass-Ceramics to Dental Structures: A Case Study

New Tricks in the Preparation Design for Prosthetic Ceramic Laminate Veeners

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About