2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.still.2008.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of alternative tillage and residue cover on yield and water use efficiency in annual double cropping system in North China Plain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Annual double crop maize–wheat is widely employed in the China (Jin et al , 2009). Thus, straw of preceding maize was used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Annual double crop maize–wheat is widely employed in the China (Jin et al , 2009). Thus, straw of preceding maize was used in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, in the Mediterranean climate region, the annual rainfall distribution and the water deficit at the end of the growing season is other limiting factor for cereal production, due to the low water infiltration and low root biomass in compacted soils (Sojka et al, 1993;Hong-ling et al, 2008;Alvarez and Steinbach, 2009;Vidhana Arachchi, 2009). Therefore, no tillage combined with subsoiling (Nt+Sb) is particularly relevant in these environments where much of crop growth occurs in spring (at the start of the dry season) and is generally subjected to a water deficit during the grain filling-period of cereals (De Vita et al, 2007;He et al, 2009;Jin et al, 2009).…”
Section: Influence Of Tillage Systems On Crop Yieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that no-till significantly reduces runoff, especially under high rainfall intensity (Sun et al, 2015); reduces soil erosion, due to the undisturbed soil surface and the presence of crop residues on the soil surface (Merten et al, 2015;Vogel et al, 2016); and may reduce subsoil compaction compared with conventional tillage, which induces high soil stresses on the subsoil during in-furrow ploughing (Chamen et al, 2003). No-till may be an advantage under dry conditions, as it has been shown to improve conservation of soil water compared with conventional tillage (De Gryze et al, 2008;Jin et al, 2009;Martínez et al, 2012). Furthermore, some studies suggest that no-till improves fertiliser use efficiency (Dang et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%