2011
DOI: 10.1134/s1063783411110308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of alloying on the self-diffusion activation energy in γ-iron

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These values of material constants and activation energy are closer to the reported values of similar kind of hot deformed steels [22][23][24]. Due to the effect of alloying elements, the apparent activation energy for hot deformation (456.42 kJmol −1 ) of present steel is much larger than the self-diffusion activation energy of austenitic steel i.e 312 kJmol −1 [25,26].…”
Section: Determination Of Materials Constants and Activation Energysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…These values of material constants and activation energy are closer to the reported values of similar kind of hot deformed steels [22][23][24]. Due to the effect of alloying elements, the apparent activation energy for hot deformation (456.42 kJmol −1 ) of present steel is much larger than the self-diffusion activation energy of austenitic steel i.e 312 kJmol −1 [25,26].…”
Section: Determination Of Materials Constants and Activation Energysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The activation energies for self-diffusion in pure iron with fcc and bcc structures are ~278 kJ/mol [36] and ~255 kJ/mol [37,38], respectively, and the activation energies for diffusion along grain boundaries and dislocations are about one-half of the value for selfdiffusion in coarse-grained materials [39,40]. Thus, the activation energy for grain boundary and bulk diffusion of iron in Fe-20Cr-25Ni-Nb stainless steel is ~178 and ~278 kJ/mol, respectively [41] and the activation energy for grain boundary diffusion of iron in 316 stainless steels is ~173 kJ/mol [42].…”
Section: Correlation Between the Microstructure And The Activation Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is attributed to the lower frequency of diffusion short circuits in the sample processed by ¼ turn due to the inherent larger grain size and the smaller dislocation density. In addition, the higher fraction of γ-austenite after ¼ turn may also contribute to the higher activation energy of recovery since diffusion in the fcc iron structure is more difficult than in the bcc phase as shown by the higher self-diffusion activation energy [36][37][38].…”
Section: Correlation Between the Microstructure And The Activation Enmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the physics of diffusional rearrangements of atoms during the boundary migration of growing grains, the related activation energy should be comparable with the activation energy of grain boundary self-diffusion that, in turn, correlates with a similar characteristic for the bulk selfdiffusion (activation energy of self-diffusion, AESD), which is higher by about two times. It is notable that known results obtained by the radioactive tracer technique, which have been compiled by the authors [24], undoubtedly indicate that AESD in solid solutions of austenite depends on their chemical compositions. An empirical expression proposed in the last quoted paper enables accurate calculation of AESD in terms of quantities of alloying elements (С, Mn, Si, Ni, Cr, Mo, Nb, V, Ti) most important for up-to-date steels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%