Effect of alloying elements on the microstructure‐property relationship in thermomechanically processed C‐Mn‐Si TRIP steels

Abstract

The effect of additions of Nb, Al and Mo to Fe‐C‐Mn‐Si TRIP steel on the final microstructure and mechanical properties after simulated thermomechanical processing (TMP) has been studied. The laboratory simulations of discontinuous cooling during TMP were performed using a hot rolling mill. All samples were characterised using optical microscopy and image analysis. The volume fraction of retained austenite was ascertained using a heat tinting technique and X‐ray diffraction measurements. Room temperature mechanical properties were determined by a tensile test. From this a comprehensive understanding of the structural aspect of the bainite transformation in these types of TRIP steels has been developed. The results have shown that the final microstructures of thermomechanically processed TRIP steels comprise ~ 50 % of polygonal ferrite, 7 ‐12 % of retained austenite, non‐carbide bainitic structure and martensite. All steels exhibited a good combination of ultimate tensile strength and total elongation. The microstructure‐property examination revealed the relationship between the composition of TRIP steels and their mechanical properties. It has been shown that the addition of Mo to the C‐Si‐Mn‐Nb TRIP steel increases the ultimate tensile strength up to 1020 MPa. The stability of the retained austenite of the Nb‐Mo steel was degraded, which led to a decrease in the elongation (24 %). The results have demonstrated that the addition of Al to C‐Si‐Mn‐Nb steel leads to a good combination of strength (~ 940 MPa) and elongation (~ 30 %) due to the formation of refined acicular ferrite and granular bainite structure with ~7 ‐ 8 % of stable retained austenite. Furthermore, it has been found that the addition of Al increases the volume fraction of bainitic ferrite laths. The investigations have shown an interesting result that, in the Nb‐Mo‐Al steel, Al has a more pronounced effect on the microstructure in comparison with Mo. It has been found that the bainitic structure of the Nb‐Mo‐Al steel appears to be more granular than in the Nb‐Mo steel. Moreover, the volume fraction of the retained austenite increased (12 %) with decreasing bainitic ferrite content. The results have demonstrated that this steel has the best mechanical properties (1100 MPa and 28 % elongation). It has been concluded that the combined effect of Nb, Mo, and Al addition on the dispersion of the bainite, martensite and retained austenite in the ferrite matrix and the morphology of these phases is different than effect of Nb, Mo and Al, separately.

Effect of nickel and molybdenum additions on weld metal toughness in a submerged arc welded HSLA line-pipe steel

“…9 and 10) in the WM. This agrees closely with the findings in a number of investigations [11,12,18,24]. It was reported that a similar microstructure combination leads to a good combination of tensile strength and toughness.…”

Characterization of strain-induced martensitic transformation in A301 stainless steel by Barkhausen noise measurement

“…Bloch walls are temporarily pinned by lattice defects induced by strain hardening. High internal stresses are generated due to an incompatible transformation strain accompanying the martensitic (first order) transformation [7] which also affects the motion of magnetic domains. A further increase of magnetic field strength is needed to overcome the pinning effect and to increase magnetization.…”

Structure and Mechanical Properties of High-Manganese Steels

“…The difference in chemical composition has an effect on increasing the transformation tendency of steel g / ε during cooling from the hot working temperature, as confirmed in numerous scientific publications (3,4,(11)(12)(13)24,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)35,36). The difference in chemical composition has an effect on increasing the transformation tendency of steel g / ε during cooling from the hot working temperature, as confirmed in numerous scientific publications (3,4,(11)(12)(13)24,(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)35,36).…”