2020
DOI: 10.3354/meps13194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of algal phenology on seasonal dynamics of gammarid assemblages: differences between canopy and understory strata in a Sargassum yezoense bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, increasing habitat size and structural complexity is known to have a positive effect on associated mobile macrofauna, which benefits from more available refuge areas and food sources (Christie et al, 2009;Norderhaug et al, 2007;Veiga et al, 2014). This general pattern is also consistent and has already been registered separately for each of the main associated groups: for mollusks, a higher abundance, species diversity, and functional diversity were observed for assemblages associated with morphologically more complex macroalgae (Chemello & Milazzo, 2002;Veiga et al, 2018;Barbosa et al, 2019 andDuarte et al, 2020); for crustaceans, similar results were found for amphipods in Sargassum beds, presenting higher abundance and diversity in association with higher biomass and/or more complex fronds (Carvalho et al, 2018;Kodama et al, 2020); and for polychaetes, a higher abundance and diversity was observed when in association with increased biomass of an invasive macroalgae (Box et al, 2010). These positive effects are also observed in smaller organisms, such as meiofaunal assemblages, which are influenced by the macroalgal cover (Ape et al, 2018;Hicks, 1980;Losi et al, 2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Overall, increasing habitat size and structural complexity is known to have a positive effect on associated mobile macrofauna, which benefits from more available refuge areas and food sources (Christie et al, 2009;Norderhaug et al, 2007;Veiga et al, 2014). This general pattern is also consistent and has already been registered separately for each of the main associated groups: for mollusks, a higher abundance, species diversity, and functional diversity were observed for assemblages associated with morphologically more complex macroalgae (Chemello & Milazzo, 2002;Veiga et al, 2018;Barbosa et al, 2019 andDuarte et al, 2020); for crustaceans, similar results were found for amphipods in Sargassum beds, presenting higher abundance and diversity in association with higher biomass and/or more complex fronds (Carvalho et al, 2018;Kodama et al, 2020); and for polychaetes, a higher abundance and diversity was observed when in association with increased biomass of an invasive macroalgae (Box et al, 2010). These positive effects are also observed in smaller organisms, such as meiofaunal assemblages, which are influenced by the macroalgal cover (Ape et al, 2018;Hicks, 1980;Losi et al, 2018).…”
supporting
confidence: 80%
“…Thus, higher biomass is usually associated with higher abundance of associated macrofauna (i.e., crustaceans, mollusks and polychaetes), as reported by Torres et al (2015) and by Chen et al (2020), that found higher abundances of the main associated groups with increasing biomass among different macroalgae species and in Sargassum beds, respectively. Studies evaluating the relationship between specific invertebrate groups and macroalgae morphological features also found similar results (Barbosa et al, 2019;Box et al, 2010;Carvalho et al, 2018;Chemello & Milazzo, 2002;Kodama et al, 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x X X X X X X X 2.0-5.9 Barnard (1969) as J. falcata thick form; Lim et al (2008); Kodama et al (2017Kodama et al ( , 2020 VAL 14-17 16-34 0-17 X X X X X X X X 2.5-6.1 Thomson (1883); LeCroy (2007); Winfield et al (2021) .......continued on the next page Delesseria, Ellisolandia, Fucus, Gelidium, Halidrys, Laminaria, Lithothamnion, Mastocarpus, Palmaria, Phyllophora, Phymatolithon, Polysiphonia, Ptilota, Saccharina, Sargassum, unidentified HER 5-18 30.5- Acoz (1993); Zintzen et al (2006Zintzen et al ( , 2008 1 Riera et al (2014) collected "Jassa marmorata" from 150 m depth at Tenerife but did not indicate that they had considered the possibility that these specimens are J. slatteryi which resembles their photographs and description and is also widespread. This depth would considerably extend the depth range known for either of these species.…”
Section: Figure 12mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conspecifics are also known to partition algae that they cohabit, with J. marmorata preferring the algal interior over the periphery (Beermann & Boos 2015). An algal canopy can provide greater access to passing detritus but the understory can be more stable year-round when the canopy seasonally sloughs (Kodama et al 2020). This explains the differential distribution of J. morinoi in Sargassum.…”
Section: Dna Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%