2010
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deq021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of air quality on assisted human reproduction 

Abstract: The effects of declining air quality on reproductive outcomes after IVF are variable, cycle-dependent and complex, though increased NO(2) is consistently associated with lower live birth rates. Our findings are limited by the lack of direct measure of pollutants at homes and lab sites.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of environmental factors on assisted reproductive technology (ART) results, and notably on IVF techniques, has been suspected for many years [33], but the specific effects of air pollution on IVF have been little studied in the literature [26]. In 7403 women undergoing their first IVF cycle, Legro et al assessed the effects of various air pollutants (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 , PM2.5 and PM10) along 4 different steps of the procedure: from the first day of ovarian stimulation to oocyte retrieval (T1); from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer (T2); from embryo transfer to pregnancy test (T3) and from embryo transfer to pregnancy outcome (T4) [34]. They found negative impacts of a one standard deviation increase in NO 2 concentrations on live births in all stages of the IVF cycle except T4 (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The influence of environmental factors on assisted reproductive technology (ART) results, and notably on IVF techniques, has been suspected for many years [33], but the specific effects of air pollution on IVF have been little studied in the literature [26]. In 7403 women undergoing their first IVF cycle, Legro et al assessed the effects of various air pollutants (SO 2 , NO 2 , O 3 , PM2.5 and PM10) along 4 different steps of the procedure: from the first day of ovarian stimulation to oocyte retrieval (T1); from oocyte retrieval to embryo transfer (T2); from embryo transfer to pregnancy test (T3) and from embryo transfer to pregnancy outcome (T4) [34]. They found negative impacts of a one standard deviation increase in NO 2 concentrations on live births in all stages of the IVF cycle except T4 (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Altogether, the data from the 3 available human studies about air quality and IVF results provide a weak level of evidence because they consist in retrospective studies, with long observation periods (7 [34] to 10 years [35,36] during which effectiveness of IVF procedures may have improved), with approximated exposures based either on estimated levels from national models of air quality [34] or on average daily exposure of an entire city [35,36], without accounting for the exact home address [35,36] or its distance from the nearest monitoring station [34] or with residual confounding from tobacco exposure [34]. Furthermore, the results of these studies are discordant regarding PM10, the only air pollutant commonly evaluated by these studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Couple-based fecundability was assessed in Teplice, where pregnancy in the first month of unprotected intercourse was less likely when couples were exposed to higher levels of nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ) and PM 2.5 (9). NO 2 was associated with lower live birth rates and PM 2.5 with decreased conception rates after in vitro fertilization (IVF),(10) whereas miscarriage rates appeared higher in couples exposed to the highest quartile of PM exposure prior to IVF or embryo transfer(11). In mice, traffic-related pollutant exposures decreased fertility with effects demonstrated for both males and females as well as mating pairs(12;13) and reductions in placental and fetal weight were observed among mice housed near roadways in Brazil(14).…”
Section: 0 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a challenge because of the variable nature of different VOCs in room air. Since indoor air quality is impacted by outdoor air, which varies regionally, the observation that air pollution affects fertility [30][31][32] provides further evidence for the importance of air filtration.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%