Abstract:Purpose. The aims of this in vitro study were to evaluate morphological changes induced by glycine powder air-polishing on titanium surfaces, biofilm removal, and biocompatibility. Material and Methods. Titanium grade IV discs were allocated into two groups: (1) discs without biofilm and (2) discs for Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation. Discs in each group were further subdivided into (a) no treatment and (b) air-polishing treatment with glycine powder. Discs were characterized by scanning electron microsc… Show more
“…After reading the full‐text articles, 10 articles were excluded: three articles due to using the AA in combination with other decontamination methods, one study was not about titanium surface, two articles did not use AA for decontamination, one study was not in English and not published in a peer‐review journal, one study used the AA powder in an antimicrobial solution but did not use the AA device, one study had an in vivo design with decontamination procedures taking place in the beagle dogs, and the full text for one study was not retrieved . The 48 included articles were ultimately processed for data extraction . The summary of the search strategy is depicted in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the 48 selected studies have been reported in chronological order in Table . It is noteworthy to mention that out of 48 included studies, only 11 studies employed devices to standardize the decontamination procedure and avoid the clinician erroneous, and only one study used a phantom head to simulate clinical conditions …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the SEM results, except for three studies that reported no surface change, other studies showed some level of morphological changes which were different in nature and intensity based on the surface modification and powder type. Regarding the surface topology, 2 studies showed that the Ra value for SB was higher than glycine and untreated controls while another study found no difference . Six articles reported on surface composition using energy dispersive‐x spectrometry (EDS) from which except for one study, others found powder remnants and changes in surface composition related to the application of AA.…”
Background
Air abrasion (AA) is one of the decontamination methods that have demonstrated promising results in treating peri‐implant diseases.
Purpose
This systematic review aimed at evaluating the in vitro effect of AA on surface change, cleaning efficacy, and biocompatibility of titanium surfaces and at comparing it with other decontamination methods.
Materials and Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted up to April 2018 using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies on the decontamination effect of AA. All types of titanium surfaces, abrasive powders, contaminated surfaces, and measuring methods were included.
Results
Overall, 1502 articles were identified. After screening the titles and abstracts, and carefully reading the full‐texts, 48 articles published between 1989 and 2018 were selected. AA was considered almost safe, particularly for the nonmodified surfaces. Nevertheless, harder powders such as sodium bicarbonate tended to damage the surface more than glycine. AA resulted in surface change similar to plastic curettes and Er: YAG lasers. Regarding the cleaning efficacy, there was no significant difference between glycine and sodium bicarbonate, but different mixtures of calcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, and erythritol were superior to glycine. AA was superior or equal to all other decontamination methods in cleaning. Regarding biocompatibility, AA was more successful in preserving biocompatibility for noncontaminated surfaces compared with contaminated surfaces and when used with erythritol and osteoinductive powders.
Conclusions
AA can efficiently remove contamination without serious damage to the surface. The main drawback of the AA method seems to be its limitation in restoring the biocompatibility of the surface.
“…After reading the full‐text articles, 10 articles were excluded: three articles due to using the AA in combination with other decontamination methods, one study was not about titanium surface, two articles did not use AA for decontamination, one study was not in English and not published in a peer‐review journal, one study used the AA powder in an antimicrobial solution but did not use the AA device, one study had an in vivo design with decontamination procedures taking place in the beagle dogs, and the full text for one study was not retrieved . The 48 included articles were ultimately processed for data extraction . The summary of the search strategy is depicted in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The characteristics of the 48 selected studies have been reported in chronological order in Table . It is noteworthy to mention that out of 48 included studies, only 11 studies employed devices to standardize the decontamination procedure and avoid the clinician erroneous, and only one study used a phantom head to simulate clinical conditions …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the SEM results, except for three studies that reported no surface change, other studies showed some level of morphological changes which were different in nature and intensity based on the surface modification and powder type. Regarding the surface topology, 2 studies showed that the Ra value for SB was higher than glycine and untreated controls while another study found no difference . Six articles reported on surface composition using energy dispersive‐x spectrometry (EDS) from which except for one study, others found powder remnants and changes in surface composition related to the application of AA.…”
Background
Air abrasion (AA) is one of the decontamination methods that have demonstrated promising results in treating peri‐implant diseases.
Purpose
This systematic review aimed at evaluating the in vitro effect of AA on surface change, cleaning efficacy, and biocompatibility of titanium surfaces and at comparing it with other decontamination methods.
Materials and Methods
A comprehensive search was conducted up to April 2018 using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases to identify studies on the decontamination effect of AA. All types of titanium surfaces, abrasive powders, contaminated surfaces, and measuring methods were included.
Results
Overall, 1502 articles were identified. After screening the titles and abstracts, and carefully reading the full‐texts, 48 articles published between 1989 and 2018 were selected. AA was considered almost safe, particularly for the nonmodified surfaces. Nevertheless, harder powders such as sodium bicarbonate tended to damage the surface more than glycine. AA resulted in surface change similar to plastic curettes and Er: YAG lasers. Regarding the cleaning efficacy, there was no significant difference between glycine and sodium bicarbonate, but different mixtures of calcium phosphate, hydroxyapatite, and erythritol were superior to glycine. AA was superior or equal to all other decontamination methods in cleaning. Regarding biocompatibility, AA was more successful in preserving biocompatibility for noncontaminated surfaces compared with contaminated surfaces and when used with erythritol and osteoinductive powders.
Conclusions
AA can efficiently remove contamination without serious damage to the surface. The main drawback of the AA method seems to be its limitation in restoring the biocompatibility of the surface.
“…This assay has been used in many past studies. 63,185,186 The study followed on from the work presented in Chapter 3 which examined the effects of instruments on Ti surfaces only (no biofilm), and likewise will use SEM to assess surface damage produced during biofilm removal.…”
Section: Titanium Brushesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…221,222 From the work in this thesis and other published studies, it appears that Er:YAG lasers, glycine particles, citric acid and electrolysis are promising areas to explore further, since these treatments are likely to either enhance biocompatibility, or at the very least, will not lower the surface energy. 93,165,186,223 From the work described in this thesis (as summarized Table 7.3), a suggested combination approach would be as follows when a purely closed debridement approach was to be used:…”
ObjectivesTo attain a collective expert opinion on the use of air powder waterjet technology (APWT) with erythritol and glycine powders in the prophylaxis and therapy of periodontal and peri‐implant diseases.Material and MethodsIn the first step, a modified one‐round online Delphi survey including 44 five‐point Likert scale questions was conducted among a group of 10 expert clinicians and researchers with thorough knowledge and experience in this topic. In the second step, the single questions and the survey results were discussed during a meeting, and consensus statements were formulated, respectively.ResultsAn agreement was reached on most items, especially opinions supporting glycine and erythritol powders as favorable with respect to efficiency, safety, and comfort. More scientific evidence is needed to support the improvement in clinical attachment on teeth and implants, especially when APWT with erythritol is used. In addition, APWT needs more long‐term evaluation and studies in terms of microbiome/microbiological effects as well as effects on the inflammatory response on natural teeth and implants, also in light of a guided biofilm therapy concept.ConclusionsIn line with the expert opinions and supported by the evidence, it was concluded that the use of APWT with erythritol and glycine powders in nonsurgical periodontal and peri‐implant therapy and prophylaxis is patient compliant and efficient.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.