2021
DOI: 10.5465/ambpp.2021.15449abstract
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of AI Chatbots´ Gender in the Business Context: Empirical Evidence from Debt Collection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings are also in line with the presumed desirability of same-gender interaction in HCI as proposed by Lee et al (2000) . However, since this evidence is not in line with other findings as outlined above ( Mullennix et al, 2003 ; Guo et al, 2020 ; Krahé et al, 2021 ), additional research needs to be conducted to get a clearer picture of causal mechanisms behind differential responses to gendered technology. To date, it has not been investigated whether attraction to similarity—in this case, to a nonhuman agent whose gender a user identifies with—is associated with higher BPN Fulfillment.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature: Agency And Gendermentioning
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These findings are also in line with the presumed desirability of same-gender interaction in HCI as proposed by Lee et al (2000) . However, since this evidence is not in line with other findings as outlined above ( Mullennix et al, 2003 ; Guo et al, 2020 ; Krahé et al, 2021 ), additional research needs to be conducted to get a clearer picture of causal mechanisms behind differential responses to gendered technology. To date, it has not been investigated whether attraction to similarity—in this case, to a nonhuman agent whose gender a user identifies with—is associated with higher BPN Fulfillment.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature: Agency And Gendermentioning
confidence: 70%
“…With regard to human preferences of voice gender, it should be noted that, starting in infancy, there seems to be a preference for the female voice ( Standley and Madsen, 1990 ). Stereotypically, females are labeled as warm, tender and sensitive, whereas males are more likely to be described as dominant, assertive and forceful ( Brems and Johnson, 1990 ; Guo et al, 2020 ). These stereotypical perceptions also align with the perception of female speech ( Wiley and Eskilson, 1985 ; Ko et al, 2006 ), which is generally attributed with greater likeability ( Krahé et al, 2021 ) and kindness ( Ko et al, 2006 ) than male speech.…”
Section: Review Of the Literature: Agency And Gendermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations