2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04053-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of aggressive versus conventional lipid lowering on atherosclerosis progression in familial hypercholesterolemia (ASAP): a prospective, randomised, double-blind trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
453
6
40

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 874 publications
(522 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
18
453
6
40
Order By: Relevance
“…The many conflicting reports on the use of statins (3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) to prevent or treat CAVD serve to illustrate this point 14, 15, 16. Although these LDL‐lowering drugs are considered an effective therapy for reducing the incidence or severity of CAD in both FH17, 18 and non‐FH populations,19, 20 randomized, prospective trials have failed to yield evidence that statins are effective at reducing the progression of CAVD 21, 22, 23. Even in individuals with FH, it remains unclear to what extent elevated LDL levels may contribute to initiation or progression of aortic valve disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many conflicting reports on the use of statins (3‐hydroxy‐3‐methylglutaryl‐coenzyme A reductase inhibitors) to prevent or treat CAVD serve to illustrate this point 14, 15, 16. Although these LDL‐lowering drugs are considered an effective therapy for reducing the incidence or severity of CAD in both FH17, 18 and non‐FH populations,19, 20 randomized, prospective trials have failed to yield evidence that statins are effective at reducing the progression of CAVD 21, 22, 23. Even in individuals with FH, it remains unclear to what extent elevated LDL levels may contribute to initiation or progression of aortic valve disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are warranted to confirm these results. p<0.001 Figure 3 p<0.001 Heart rate, bpm 69 (12) 69 (12) 69 (10) 68 (10) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Through a reference check one additional trial was identified 32) . Ultimately, this resulted in 15 CIMT trials for analyses 5, 7-10, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18,19,21,22,30,32) . For each drug used in the CIMT trials, the corresponding event trials were searched, resulting in 15 clinical event trials for lovastatin, pravastatin, fluvastatin, simvastatin, atorvastatin, torcetrapib, rosuvastatin and ezetimibe, as presented in Table 2 [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49] .…”
Section: Search Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%