2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of age and gender on the processing characteristics of buffalo meat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
72
1
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
72
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Dunne et al (2004) Instrumental meat quality and sensory evaluation pH measurement is an important tool to give a reasonably good indication of the meat quality at the commercial level (Miller, 2002), as instrumental and sensory meat quality characteristics (such as colour, shear force value, water holding capacity and sensory tenderness) are influenced by meat pHu. Kandeepan et al (2009) Gender did not significantly influence expressed juice and cooking loss, which are related to tenderness and juiciness of meat (Miller, 2002). Panellists also gave similar scores to meat from male and female water buffalos in terms of sensory juiciness.…”
Section: Carcass Qualitymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Dunne et al (2004) Instrumental meat quality and sensory evaluation pH measurement is an important tool to give a reasonably good indication of the meat quality at the commercial level (Miller, 2002), as instrumental and sensory meat quality characteristics (such as colour, shear force value, water holding capacity and sensory tenderness) are influenced by meat pHu. Kandeepan et al (2009) Gender did not significantly influence expressed juice and cooking loss, which are related to tenderness and juiciness of meat (Miller, 2002). Panellists also gave similar scores to meat from male and female water buffalos in terms of sensory juiciness.…”
Section: Carcass Qualitymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…During this period, flavour scores of spent buffalo groups were found to be better than young male group. This was attributed to higher fat content in keema from spent buffalo groups as reported by Kandeepan et al (2009). As storage period increased, flavour scores decreased significantly (P<0.05).…”
Section: Microbiological Changes At Refrigerated Storagementioning
confidence: 54%
“…Some studies comparing water buffalo meat to beef have shown that the nutritional and organoleptic properties of the former are, overall, similar and in some respects -colour, rheology, flavour, etc. -even superior to those of the latter (Di Luccia et al 2003;Kandeepan et al 2009) although they recommend sacrificing animals at a relatively young age in order to improve the marketing properties of the meat and assure better physicochemical and organoleptic characteristics (Andrighetto et al 2008). However, meat is often introduced into commercial circuits without being identified as such (Atencio-Valladares et al 2007), so most buffalo meat may actually be sold as "beef " (Andrighetto et al 2008) because the taste is virtually indistinguishable (Ban-Tokuda et al 2007).…”
Section: Meat Productivitymentioning
confidence: 99%