Effect of Aerobic Versus Anaerobic Exercise on Quality of Life in Stroke Patients

Abstract

Background: Stroke is one of the world's leading causes of death and long-term lack of ability. Objectives: This study aimed to test the effect of aerobic versus anaerobic exercise on stroke patients' quality of life. Methods: Thirty male patients with stroke enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into three groups at random: two research groups (GA) and (GB) and one control group (GC). A traditional physical-therapy program was provided for the control group (GC) including: Passive Range of motion exercises for tightens muscles, Facilitation for weak muscles through: PNF technique, quick stretching. Besides traditional physical therapy, an aerobic exercise was performed by the patients in a study group (GA). Other than traditional physical treatment, patients received anaerobic training in the study group (GB). The session time for each group was 50-60 min; it is conducted three times a week for eight weeks. The Outcome Measures: The Arabic version of a short form dimension test (SF-36) used to assess the QOL items of the SF-36 were divided into eight different domains. All groups were evaluated before and after intervention with a QOL questionnaire (SF36). Results: There was a statistical meaningful increase in physical functioning, (vitality) energy/fatigue, emotional well-being, social functioning, pain and general-health in study groups (GA), (GB) compared with that of control group (GC) after therapy. However, there was no significant difference between groups in role limitations due to physical health and role limitations due to emotional problems. There was no meaningful difference in the quality of life items within groups (GA), (GB) after therapy. Conclusion: Eight weeks of training revealed non-significant difference between aerobic and anaerobic groups. However, either aerobic or anaerobic training has a beneficial effect on quality of life in stroke patients.