2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of adhesive thickness, adhesive type and scarf angle on the mechanical properties of scarf adhesive joints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The material of adherend was selected as mild steel, which was defined as the isotropic elastic model utilizing Young's modulus E=209GPa and Poisson's ratio ν=0.3. Owing to the adhesive layer with much lower stiffness compared with the adherend, the failure was assumed to initiate in the adhesive layer (cohesive failure) [4][5][6][7][9][10]. Accordingly, CZM in ABAQUS ® commercial code was adopted to describe the progressive damage based on triangle T-S law with mixed-mode [4][5][6].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The material of adherend was selected as mild steel, which was defined as the isotropic elastic model utilizing Young's modulus E=209GPa and Poisson's ratio ν=0.3. Owing to the adhesive layer with much lower stiffness compared with the adherend, the failure was assumed to initiate in the adhesive layer (cohesive failure) [4][5][6][7][9][10]. Accordingly, CZM in ABAQUS ® commercial code was adopted to describe the progressive damage based on triangle T-S law with mixed-mode [4][5][6].…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the influential factors to the joint failure can be divided into two categories, the stress state of the adhesive layer and mechanical properties of the adhesive [4][5][6]. For the interface stress state, it is decided by the geometrical configurations [2] and constraint effects [3] together.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations