2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of adhesion defects on crack propagation in double cantilever beam test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For TiT configuration, we replace equation (17) in equation (11) and equation (18) in equation (11) and we obtain respectively:…”
Section: 2interfaces With Longitudinal Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For TiT configuration, we replace equation (17) in equation (11) and equation (18) in equation (11) and we obtain respectively:…”
Section: 2interfaces With Longitudinal Patternmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The decomposition of the finite defect into transversal with finite length and parallel with finite width results in an overlap between the two shapes. esearchers have developed a mathematical model for crack growth based on the effects of transversal defects [17] [18]. The second part, which is addressed in this research paper, is dedicated to investigating the impact of parallel defects on the total critical SERR G c of the specimen containing these defects.…”
Section: Fig 1 Transverse and Parallel Interface Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, adhesive joints present a lack of long-term reliability because of environmental and mechanical degradations [1][2][3][4][5]. Consequently, to increase the in-service reliability and safety of adhesively bonded joints in primary structures, either a damage tolerant design [6] or a Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) approach [7,8] are, nowadays, being developed and implemented.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…crack) initiation and propagation. That can be a consequence of either the presence of manufacturing defects (such as voids, kissing 2 bonds and inclusions among many others) or in-service loading conditions (such as fatigue or impacts) or both simultaneously, by the geometry of the joint and by the material of the substrates [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%