2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5016703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of additives on MWCNT dispersion and electrical percolation in polyamide 12 composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are already some reports about TE properties when using ILs as an additive in melt-mixed composites with CNTs. Typically, ILs improve the dispersion of the fillers and thus, higher electrical conductivities can be achieved or the electrical percolation threshold can be reduced. For PP/single-walled CNT (SWCNT)-based composites, Luo et al showed that the addition of the IL OMIM-BF 4 resulted in a significant increase in electrical conductivity, as well as Seebeck coefficient, however, the conduction behavior remained p-type . Voigt et al compared the effect of five kinds of ILs on the TE properties of PP/SWCNT composites and found that switching from p- to n-type behavior is possible depending on the IL structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are already some reports about TE properties when using ILs as an additive in melt-mixed composites with CNTs. Typically, ILs improve the dispersion of the fillers and thus, higher electrical conductivities can be achieved or the electrical percolation threshold can be reduced. For PP/single-walled CNT (SWCNT)-based composites, Luo et al showed that the addition of the IL OMIM-BF 4 resulted in a significant increase in electrical conductivity, as well as Seebeck coefficient, however, the conduction behavior remained p-type . Voigt et al compared the effect of five kinds of ILs on the TE properties of PP/SWCNT composites and found that switching from p- to n-type behavior is possible depending on the IL structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the solutions explored are based on the use of carbon nanoparticles such as graphene and single-wall (SWCNT) or multi-wall carbon nanotubes (MWCNT), dispersed in a polymeric matrix at a concentration that allows the formation of a percolation network [13][14][15] , producing an electrically conductive nanocomposite [16][17][18][19] . The advantage of using nanoparticles is the small concentration required to modify the electrical response of the composites from insulating to conductive, the scientific community reporting concentrations ranging from 0,002% to 5% (w/w) [20][21][22][23][24][25] depending on the morphology and properties of the CNT, and on the preparation method (the lower concentration range is usually attained when using solution mixing, whilst higher concentrations are required when adopting melt mixing). In order to achieve an electrically conductive polymer composite at a low carbon nanoparticle content, a sufficiently good nanoparticle dispersion and distribution in the polymer is necessary [26][27][28] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%