1994
DOI: 10.1109/19.293456
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of additive dither on the resolution of ideal quantizers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Amplitude deviations of this size are quite common in a production environment, where deviations around 1% may occur, yielding a deviation of more than one and a half quantization step in a 6-bit converter [3]. The present-day solution to this sensitivity problem is noise dithering [1]. But this technique has several drawbacks, in particular the relatively high number of samples required to achieve a significant reduction of the sensibility of the THD and the influence of the noise dither on the SINAD parameter.…”
Section: Influence Of the Input Signal Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amplitude deviations of this size are quite common in a production environment, where deviations around 1% may occur, yielding a deviation of more than one and a half quantization step in a 6-bit converter [3]. The present-day solution to this sensitivity problem is noise dithering [1]. But this technique has several drawbacks, in particular the relatively high number of samples required to achieve a significant reduction of the sensibility of the THD and the influence of the noise dither on the SINAD parameter.…”
Section: Influence Of the Input Signal Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total variation observed in this case appears quite important but much more predictable. For instance considering an input signal with a peakto-peak amplitude 2 LSB higher than FS, a deviation of ±0.1 LSB in the amplitude results in a variation of about 0.4 dB in the SINAD, 0.7 dB in the SFDR and 0.8 dB in the TDH [1][2][3][4][5] , corresponding to relative accuracy of 1.3%, 2% and 2.2% respectively. The relative accuracy for a given amplitude deviation around a nominal point is therefore greatly improved by the use of an input signal with an amplitude higher than full scale, even if measured values do not directly represent the ADC performances.…”
Section: Influence Of the Input Signal Amplitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the input signal is larger or smaller than 1/2, there will be an error such that the expected error of the output is nonzero. For Gaussian noise combined with a uniform quantizer with many levels, Carbone and Petri (1994) derived…”
Section: Error Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…establishes the same currents from M 6 and M 13 . Then no DC current will be injected into the ASCS-stage.…”
Section: Systematic Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But dithering will increase the overall noise as well. For the interested reader, the articles [12,13,14] give more information on this topic Chapter 3…”
Section: Ditheringmentioning
confidence: 99%