2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of additional warning sounds on pedestrians’ detection of electric vehicles: An ecological approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All participants were informed that normal hearing was a requirement for the test. The frequency of the normal hearing test was set between 500 and 4000 Hz as measured using an audiometer [10]. Three participants were excluded owing to hearing problems or because they misunderstood the test instructions.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All participants were informed that normal hearing was a requirement for the test. The frequency of the normal hearing test was set between 500 and 4000 Hz as measured using an audiometer [10]. Three participants were excluded owing to hearing problems or because they misunderstood the test instructions.…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, pedestrians could judge whether a vehicle was approaching or still distant based on the noise it produced [2,8]. However, previous studies such as Cocron and Krems [9], Fleury et al [10] and Pardo-Ferreira et al [11] indicated that electric vehicles generate lower noise levels than ICE vehicles at low speeds, making it more difficult for pedestrians to detect their approach and thereby negatively affecting pedestrian safety [12,13]. Robart and Rosenblum [14] asked participants to estimate the direction of electric vehicles and ICE vehicles moving at 8 km/h through headphones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations