2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1684(02)00507-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ADC and receiver saturation on adaptive spatial filtering of directional interference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Clearly, P 0 depends on the saturation value of the initiator's ADC. This threshold is usually lower than the initiator's nominal saturation value due to the nonlinearity effect of ADCs [10]. Based on the results in Fig.…”
Section: Limitations On Power Superpositionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Clearly, P 0 depends on the saturation value of the initiator's ADC. This threshold is usually lower than the initiator's nominal saturation value due to the nonlinearity effect of ADCs [10]. Based on the results in Fig.…”
Section: Limitations On Power Superpositionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We cannot ensure that MPO is always below a certain value with more responders. (2) Constrained by the saturation rate of ADC built in the initiator, sample values exceeding a threshold will be truncated [10], which indicates that there exists an upper bound on the observed received power of a superposed signal.…”
Section: Limitations On Power Superpositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main obstacle lies in the fact that the desired signal from a neighbor node is much weaker (up to 60 dB) than the local transmission. New engineering design in either the analog domain (for circuit noise cancellation) or the digital domain (for digital noise cancellation after ADC sampling) is necessary [15]. A recent work of Choi et al [16] studies a new way of implementing a full-duplex wireless link with off-the-shelf hardware only.…”
Section: A Wireless Network Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distance between and any cluster head, which is not , is at least , as each node belongs to a cluster of the closest head (lines [10][11][12][13][14][15]. In the proof of Lemma 4.3, we showed that for any .…”
Section: B Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%