2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10974-022-09614-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of acute swimming exercise at different intensities but equal total load over metabolic and molecular responses in swimming rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…No studies investigating the effect of low/moderate intensity on mRNA in humans were included in the present review. In rodents, the use of low/moderate intensity has been more common than high‐intensity exercise, observing an increase in SLC16A1 mRNA at some point in most cases, 18,30–33 except one study 34 . Of the nine exercise sessions (applied by the six studies), five of them produced increases in SLC16A1 mRNA, and four produced increases in SLC16A3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…No studies investigating the effect of low/moderate intensity on mRNA in humans were included in the present review. In rodents, the use of low/moderate intensity has been more common than high‐intensity exercise, observing an increase in SLC16A1 mRNA at some point in most cases, 18,30–33 except one study 34 . Of the nine exercise sessions (applied by the six studies), five of them produced increases in SLC16A1 mRNA, and four produced increases in SLC16A3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although based on scarce studies, single‐session interventions with high‐intensity do not appear to be sufficient stimulus to generate changes in mRNA for any of the muscle SLC16A1 or SLC16A3 in male humans (no human study utilize low‐/moderate‐intensity exercise) 16,17 . On the contrary, the four interventions in rodents with single‐session interventions show increases at some point both in SLC16A1 18,30–32 and SLC16A3 mRNA 18,30,31 . The discrepancies between humans and animals could be due to several reasons, like the training status of the sample (training status is not usually evaluated in rodents) or the setting of the exercise intensity (relative intensity in humans vs. absolute intensity in rodents).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although experiments with rodents submitted to physical training allow a refined control of factorial variables, individualized prescription and load monitoring are recurrently overlooked. This perspective enables deep interpretations of the physical training on stress biomarkers ( de Araujo et al, 2012 ) and molecular adaptations ( Rodrigues et al, 2021 ; Forte et al, 2022 ). Previous studies have submitted BALB/c (Nu/Nu) mice to physical training lasting 8 ( Jones et al, 2005 ; Hagar et al, 2019 ) or 12 weeks ( Lee et al, 2017 ; Lee et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many patients will complain of peripheral pulmonary respiratory embolism. Many aerobic swimming exercise findings of heart failure are related to the neurohormonal changes that help compensate for the reduced cardiac output and acute pulmonary respiratory embolism [31]. An increased CRF may be present as a result of decreased sympathetic tone.…”
Section: Cardiorespiratory Fitness (Crf)mentioning
confidence: 99%