2015
DOI: 10.1186/s41039-015-0014-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of active learning using program visualization in technology-constrained college classrooms

Abstract: Multiple studies report that Computer Science (CS) instructors face problems on how to integrate visualizations in their teaching. This problem gets compounded for instructors in technology-constrained classrooms that are common in developing countries. In these classrooms, students are not able to interact with visualization directly; instead, their interaction is mediated by the instructor who alone may have access to the visualization. In the current study, we contrasted learning outcome from integrating pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These taxonomies hypothesized that using a higher level of engagement will improve learning outcome. Even though previous studies measured the effect of engagement level on learning outcomes, their results were not consistent [8]. Furthermore, these taxonomies still lack the description of the relationship between engagement levels and learning outcomes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These taxonomies hypothesized that using a higher level of engagement will improve learning outcome. Even though previous studies measured the effect of engagement level on learning outcomes, their results were not consistent [8]. Furthermore, these taxonomies still lack the description of the relationship between engagement levels and learning outcomes [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…ET has historically been one of the most commonly used evaluation frameworks (Banerjee, Murthy, & Iyer, 2015;Velázquez-Iturbide et al, 2017). Even though previous studies measured the effect of engagement level on learning outcomes, their results were not consistent (Banerjee et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Role Of Engagement With Software Visualizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, Banerjee et al (2015) compared the learning outcome by using program visualization in response to different engagement levels (Naps Taxonomy); namely: "responding" and "viewing". It also showed a significant relationship between cognitive achievement as a dependent variable and the perception of learning when using a higher engagement level (Responding over Viewing) as an independent variable.…”
Section: Cer Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental group was taught with LDs generated using CuVIS for their chosen topic, visualization and learning objective, while the control group was taught with the LD traditionally used by the instructor. Details of both experiments can be found in Banerjee, Murthy, and Iyer (2015) and Banerjee, Patwardhan, and Murthy (2014).…”
Section: Impact On Student Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%