1980
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-51-2-255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Actinomycin D and Cycloheximide on Epstein-Barr Virus Early Antigen Induction in Lymphoblastoid Cells

Abstract: (iv) Concomitant treatment with CH and TPA followed by addition of either iododeoxyuridine or n-butyric acid results in 'superinduction'. Virtually all cells exhibit EBV-specified antigens. This implies that induction of virus antigens by tumour promoters requires the synthesis of a specific RNA, that this RNA increases in concentration during the induction period and that the same RNA is not required for EBV transcription after exogenous infection.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As we had previously observed the upregulation of PUMA, NOXA and BAX mRNA, we initially hypothesised that this could be mediated by the upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes at the mRNA level. However, we were surprised to find that a transcription inhibitor (Yamamoto et al, 1980), although effectively blocking IP6-induced upregulation of gene expression ( Figure 3B), did not protect cells from the effects of IP6 ( Figure 3A). As protein expression can be modulated by post-transcriptional events including mRNA export, mRNA translation and proteasome-mediated protein degradation, it remained possible that the ratio of pro-apoptotic to antiapoptotic proteins could shift in response to IP6 independently of mRNA transcription and actinomycin D. Indeed, PC3 cells in which protein translation was blocked using cycloheximide were significantly protected from the effects of IP6 (Figure 3C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we had previously observed the upregulation of PUMA, NOXA and BAX mRNA, we initially hypothesised that this could be mediated by the upregulation of pro-apoptotic genes at the mRNA level. However, we were surprised to find that a transcription inhibitor (Yamamoto et al, 1980), although effectively blocking IP6-induced upregulation of gene expression ( Figure 3B), did not protect cells from the effects of IP6 ( Figure 3A). As protein expression can be modulated by post-transcriptional events including mRNA export, mRNA translation and proteasome-mediated protein degradation, it remained possible that the ratio of pro-apoptotic to antiapoptotic proteins could shift in response to IP6 independently of mRNA transcription and actinomycin D. Indeed, PC3 cells in which protein translation was blocked using cycloheximide were significantly protected from the effects of IP6 (Figure 3C).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As IP6 treatment could lead to protein upregulation independently of transcription, we next assessed the efficacy of IP6 in PC3 cells where protein production was blocked using cycloheximide (50 mg ml À1 , 4 h pre-treatment). Figure 3C shows that a continuous treatment with the translation inhibitor cycloheximide (Yamamoto et al, 1980), starting 4 h before treatment with IP6, significantly protected from IP6- )-and ethanol-pre-treated PC3 cells were treated with increasing doses of IP6 for 24 h and metabolic activity was measured using WST-1. Data represent an average of three independent experiments performed in three to six replicates.…”
Section: Protein Synthesis Is Important For Ip6-induced Cytotoxicitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endogenous or silent retrovirus genomes were activated by 5AZcd, and activation of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) genome or the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase gene has been detected in cells treated with 5AZcd or iododeoxyuridine (IUdR) (Gerber, 1972;Groudine et al, 1981;Glough et al, 1982;Jaenisch et al, 1985;Niwa et al, 1983;Yamamoto et al, 1980). The effect of these reagents on cell differentiation or viral gene activation may be correlated with a fluctuation of 2-5AS levels, although it is also possible that the enzyme activity may be due to non-specific gene activation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transcription of these genes is independent on de novo protein synthesis in superinfected Raji cells [28]. but not in TPA plus »-buty rate-treated P3HR-1 cells [29][30][31], Once cells enter the lytic phase, EBV early protein synthesis is induced, fol lowed by replication of viral DNA and subsequent synthe sis of EBV late proteins. The present study has demon strated that EBV DNA amplification in superinfected Raji cells is suppressed by SNAP without affecting EBV early protein synthesis required for progeny EBV DNA replication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%