2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-682x(02)00120-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of acoustical damping with a porous absorptive layer in the cavity to reduce the structure-borne sound radiation from a double-leaf structure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The coincidence effect of walls and the mass-air-mass resonance of double-leaf structures are not unique phenomena for airborne sound transmission. 11,12…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coincidence effect of walls and the mass-air-mass resonance of double-leaf structures are not unique phenomena for airborne sound transmission. 11,12…”
Section: A Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different models have also been used to optimize the effect of the porous layer and increase the transmission loss performance of the double panel structure. The optimization was mainly based on the blanket configuration, 7,[10][11][12] i.e., thickness, position and boundary conditions, or on the properties of the porous layer such as static airflow resistivity or bulk density. 3,7,11 Even though these aforementioned models allow one to predict quite accurately the effect of a blanket on the sound transmission loss of the double panel structure, it remains unclear what acoustical properties the absorbing blanket should own to optimize the sound transmission loss of the double panel structure.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization was mainly based on the blanket configuration, 7,[10][11][12] i.e., thickness, position and boundary conditions, or on the properties of the porous layer such as static airflow resistivity or bulk density. 3,7,11 Even though these aforementioned models allow one to predict quite accurately the effect of a blanket on the sound transmission loss of the double panel structure, it remains unclear what acoustical properties the absorbing blanket should own to optimize the sound transmission loss of the double panel structure. Indeed, considering an unbounded blanket inside the cavity, this layer will dissipate acoustical energy by means of two main contributions: sound absorption in the air-gaps separating the blanket from the panels and sound transmission loss through the blanket.…”
Section: ͑1͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double-leaf structures are also suitable for the reduction of sound radiation from these types of force-excited vibration. To reduce the force-excited sound radiation from a doubleleaf structure, practical methods using porous layers in the cavity [8] and perforated board in combination with honeycomb layer systems [9] have been theoretically studied. Floor impact sound problems, such as footfall, are another typical source of force-excited sound radiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%