2001
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200107000-00020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Acetabular Cup Position and Orientation in Cemented Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
100
1
9

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
100
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of difference in linear PE wear rate and variance between the NHC and HHC groups and the wide distribution of PE wear values in both groups are in accordance with the results of studies that found not only the hip center is responsible for PE wear in a hip arthroplasty but also numerous other factors, such as cup inclination, articulating surfaces, femoral head size, and patient age or body weight [16,17,20,23,24,38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The lack of difference in linear PE wear rate and variance between the NHC and HHC groups and the wide distribution of PE wear values in both groups are in accordance with the results of studies that found not only the hip center is responsible for PE wear in a hip arthroplasty but also numerous other factors, such as cup inclination, articulating surfaces, femoral head size, and patient age or body weight [16,17,20,23,24,38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The true acetabulum was identified by the location of its inferior portion after the marginal osteophyte was cleared. The postoperative radiographs showed that the mean location of the hip centre was 26.7 ± 2.77 mm horizontally and 18.7±4.06 mm vertically, which are more accurate than those reported for other studies [8,11]. Proper positioning of the hip centre prevents the acetabular component from loosening.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Cup size and position were determined with reference to the anteroposterior width of the acetabulum, bony coverage [16], limb length, and stem anteversion [17] (Figure 1). Cup anteversion was based on stem anteversion, set at 10 increments [18] while maintaining the radiographic inclination of the cup at 40 to avoid edge loading and excessive wear [1,[19][20][21] (Table II). (2) Preparation.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%