2015
DOI: 10.15406/aovs.2015.03.00074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect Of Accelerated Corneal Collagen Cross Linking (CXL) On Corneal Endothelium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The statistically significant changes in endothelial cell count and coefficient of variance were persistent until the end of 1-year follow-up. 24 In contrast, other studies had assumed that accelerated CXL had inconsiderable impacts on the value of ECD and 6-month follow-up of 23 patients with progressive KC treated by accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm 2 for 10 minutes) revealed insignificant endothelial cell changes ( P =0.082). 25 Another comparative study between standard CXL (3 mW/cm 2 for 30 minutes) in one eye of 21 patients and accelerated CXL (7 mW/cm 2 for 15 minutes) in the fellow eye provided a similar result on the safety of both accelerated and standard CXL on the corneal endothelium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The statistically significant changes in endothelial cell count and coefficient of variance were persistent until the end of 1-year follow-up. 24 In contrast, other studies had assumed that accelerated CXL had inconsiderable impacts on the value of ECD and 6-month follow-up of 23 patients with progressive KC treated by accelerated CXL (9 mW/cm 2 for 10 minutes) revealed insignificant endothelial cell changes ( P =0.082). 25 Another comparative study between standard CXL (3 mW/cm 2 for 30 minutes) in one eye of 21 patients and accelerated CXL (7 mW/cm 2 for 15 minutes) in the fellow eye provided a similar result on the safety of both accelerated and standard CXL on the corneal endothelium.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The substantial obvious changes were observed at the first week and the first month, and then, corneal endothelial count returned to the baseline values at 6 months, whereas 6A and CV returned to their base values only at 3 months. 23 The second study 24 used more intensive UVA irradiance (30 mW/cm 2 for 3 minutes) and reported that changes did not return to its base value. The statistically significant changes in endothelial cell count and coefficient of variance were persistent until the end of 1-year follow-up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The assessment of endothelial cell density (ECD) loss in standard and accelerated and transepithelial CXL protocols in the pediatric group has not produced a statistically significant decrease in ECD after the procedure [ 21 , 23 , 56 , 58 , 61 , 69 , 70 , 76 , 80 , 82 , 96 , 97 ]; however, other studies reported that, depending on the protocol and carrier used, there is damage to endothelial cell density [ 68 , 98 100 ]. In a retrospective SCXL study developed by Barbisan et al in 2020, involving 105 eyes, a statistically significant reduction in ECD was observed, as well as corneal thinning after 1 year of follow-up, evidencing the potential impact of CXL on anatomy and corneal physiology [ 68 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher mean preoperative endothelial cell count in our study is another possible factor interpreting the safer outcome. Bhandari et al [ 22 ] documented that the changes in endothelial cell count and coefficient of variance were statistically significant and persisted until the end of the 12-month follow-up period following cl-ACXL with intensive UVA irradiance of 30 mW/cm 2 for 3 min. A possible interpretation of their findings is the use of more intense UVA irradiance (30 mW/cm 2 ) in a continuous mode.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%