1995
DOI: 10.1116/1.588329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of absorber thickness on image shortening in x-ray lithography

Abstract: Image shortening effects have been shown to be a problem for pattern replication using current optical tools. However, a previous study ͓R. DellaGuardia, J. R. Maldonado, and H. Oertel, J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 12, 3936 ͑1994͔͒ indicated that image shortening is less pronounced when pattern replication is performed using x-ray lithography. This article describes the effect of absorber thickness on the image shortening observed in x-ray lithography. The goal is to determine the optimum absorber thickness that mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10 was not reduced with resist changes and was only partially reduced with APEX-E resist process changes. This agreement allows reasonably accurate prediction of exposure latitude, gap latitude, and absorber thickness latitude for one-dimensional 75-125 nm features exposed at Ͻ25 m gap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…10 was not reduced with resist changes and was only partially reduced with APEX-E resist process changes. This agreement allows reasonably accurate prediction of exposure latitude, gap latitude, and absorber thickness latitude for one-dimensional 75-125 nm features exposed at Ͻ25 m gap.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…One recent study by Maldonado et al 10 addressed image shortening in two-dimensional patterning. One recent study by Maldonado et al 10 addressed image shortening in two-dimensional patterning.…”
Section: Issues In 2d Patterningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to be cost effective for manufacturing, extendibility of x-ray lithography to Ͻ130 nm ground rule patterning is essential. In this study, experimental measurements of 75-125 nm linewidth patterning at [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].5 m gaps are presented. Because the mask is not in contact with the resist on the wafer, diffraction in the gap between the mask and wafer degrades the image of the absorber pattern.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%