2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-8524(03)00002-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of abiotic factors on the antibacterial activity of chitosan against waterborne pathogens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
106
2
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
5
106
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, A. hydrophila and S. aureus were found to be less susceptible to chitosan at pH 8.0, with a population reduction of 0.57-1.00 log cfu/mL, respectively. These results are slightly different from those reported by Chung et al, (2003), who found that the inhibition percentage of chitosan solution decreased with increasing of pH but dropped dramatically when the pH was higher than 6.0.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Antibacterial Activity Of Chitosancontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, A. hydrophila and S. aureus were found to be less susceptible to chitosan at pH 8.0, with a population reduction of 0.57-1.00 log cfu/mL, respectively. These results are slightly different from those reported by Chung et al, (2003), who found that the inhibition percentage of chitosan solution decreased with increasing of pH but dropped dramatically when the pH was higher than 6.0.…”
Section: Effect Of Ph On the Antibacterial Activity Of Chitosancontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these attributes, it has broad ranges of present and potential applications including biotechnology, drug delivery, cosmetics, agriculture, food science, textiles, etc. (Li et al 1992;Remunan-Lopez and Bodmeier 1997;Okamoto et al 2002;Cheng et al 2003;Chung et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They observed that chitosan with high molecular weight showed strong antimicrobial activity against Gram positive bacteria, whereas chitosans of 11 kDa and 20-30 kDa molecular weight were most effective against Gram negative bacteria. Chung et al (2003) recently reported that the antibacterial activity of chitosan against Escherichia coli and S. aureus increased with ionic force and at a pH less than 6.0, but decreased with the addition of metal ion. Additionally, they observed that the antibacterial activity of chitosan increased against Escherichia coli in the presence of EDTA, but there was no significant change against S. aureus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%