2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.07.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a real steam turbine on thermoeconomic analysis of combined cycle power plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All terms are divided by the produced energy (E). These costs are calculated with the hypotheses 26 summarized in Table 3. The Fuel Specific Cost ( citalicfuel) imposed is 6.31 €/GJ that is the national average price of the year 2018.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All terms are divided by the produced energy (E). These costs are calculated with the hypotheses 26 summarized in Table 3. The Fuel Specific Cost ( citalicfuel) imposed is 6.31 €/GJ that is the national average price of the year 2018.…”
Section: Cost Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hunkun Li et al [11] established the thermoeconomic model of a CCGT to calculate the non-energy costs of each component in the system. Carlo et al [15] used the thermoeconomic analysis method to study the effects of steam pressure on the CCGT performance. Xiong et al [16] conducted a thermoeconomic analysis by establishing a 600 MW coal-fired power plant model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors considered energy and economic viewpoint during the repowering of the power plant. Carcasci et al 11 examined the thermoeconomic performance of a combined cycle power plant. The authors considered a two-pressure level combined cycle during their study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%