2007
DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000287593.54658.89
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a rapid response system for patients in shock on time to treatment and mortality during 5 years*

Abstract: Over time, a rapid response system for patients in shock continued to reduce time to treatment, resulting in a continued decrease in mortality. By year 5, only three patients needed to be treated to save one additional life.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
118
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
118
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Condition-specific protocols, checklists, and ''bundles'' 36 tailored to a ward environment (as opposed to the ICU or to the entire hospital) might prevent deteriorations in these patients, as has been reported for sepsis. 37 The second route is to improve the overall capabilities of rapid response and ''code blue'' teams. Such research would need to include a more careful assessment of what commonalities exist among patients who were and were not successfully ''rescued'' by these teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Condition-specific protocols, checklists, and ''bundles'' 36 tailored to a ward environment (as opposed to the ICU or to the entire hospital) might prevent deteriorations in these patients, as has been reported for sepsis. 37 The second route is to improve the overall capabilities of rapid response and ''code blue'' teams. Such research would need to include a more careful assessment of what commonalities exist among patients who were and were not successfully ''rescued'' by these teams.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…heart rate, blood pressure, respiratory rate) and other parameters to 'track' a patient's condition, detect deterioration early and 'trigger' appropriate clinical intervention. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends that such systems be used for all hospitalised patients [3] as delayed interventions for acutely ill patients leads to poor outcomes [4,5]. National guidance recommends the use of EWS in maternity [1,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both sepsis and septic shock are known to be associated with high morbidity, longer hospital stay and increased health care cost (Kumar et al 2011). Often, the risk of sepsis-related adverse outcomes can be reduced by early treatment (Sebat et al 2007), thus a scoring system that allows precise tracking of changes in sepsis-related disease severity is of great importance.…”
Section: Sepsis Mimic-ii and The Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelinementioning
confidence: 99%