Effect of a prospective payment method for health facilities on direct medical expenditures in a low-resource setting: a paired pre-post study

Abstract

Almost all sub-Saharan countries have adopted cost-reduction policies to facilitate access to health care. However, several studies underline the reimbursement delays experienced by health facilities, which lead to deficient implementation of these policies. In April 2016, for its free care policy, Burkina Faso shifted from fee-for-service (FFS) paid retrospectively to FFS paid prospectively. This study tested the hypothesis that this new method of payment would be associated with an increase in direct medical expenditures (expenses covered by the policies) associated with deliveries. This paired pre-post study used data from two cross-sectional national surveys. Observations were paired according to the health facility and the type of delivery. We used a combined approach (state and household perspectives) to capture all direct medical expenses (delivery fees, drugs and supplies costs, paraclinical exam costs and hospitalization fees). A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the hypothesis that the 2016 distribution of direct medical expenditures was greater than that for 2014. A total of 279 pairs of normal deliveries, 66 dystocia deliveries and 48 caesareans were analysed. The direct medical expenditure medians were USD 4.97 [interquartile range (IQR): 4.30–6.02], 22.10 [IQR: 15.59–29.32] and 103.58 [IQR: 85.13–113.88] in 2014 vs USD 5.55 [IQR: 4.55–6.88], 23.90 [IQR: 17.55–48.81] and 141.54 [IQR: 104.10–172.02] in 2016 for normal, dystocia and caesarean deliveries, respectively. Except for dystocia (P = 0.128) and medical centres (P = 0.240), the 2016 direct medical expenditures were higher than the 2014 expenses, regardless of the type of delivery and level of care. The 2016 expenditures were higher than the 2014 expenditures, regardless of the components considered. In the context of cost-reduction policies in sub-Saharan countries, greater attention must be paid to the provider payment method and cost-control measures because these elements may generate an increase in medical expenditures, which threatens the sustainability of these policies.

Financing of surgery and anaesthesia in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review

“…A before-and-after study in Burkina Faso showed that both government and household expenditure on CS increased after the free delivery policy changed from retrospective fee-for-service payment to prospective fee-for-service payment. 82 The other study showed that the introduction of performancebased financing at DHs in Rwanda was associated with an increase in the number of CS from 60 to 140 per quarter over a 5-year period. 83…”

Analysis of the Social Security Institution’s Health Spending: An Ardl Bounds Test Approach

“…It was also reported in the same study in some countries (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh) that while outpatient treatment services were more inexpensive in private HCPs, inpatient treatment services were more inexpensive in public HCPs (Saksena et al, 2012). In a study that investigated the effects of the prospective fee-forservice payment method for payments made to HCPs in Burkina, it was found that there was an increase in the medical spending of HCPs as a result of the transition in 2016 from fee-forservice paid retrospectively to fee-for-service paid prospectively (Meda et al, 2020).…”

Prediction of Diagnosis-Related Groups for Appendectomy Patients Using C4.5 and Neural Network

“…Due to the gradual increase in medical expenditures each year, insurance institutions in many countries, such as Germany, Canada, Japan, Taiwan, etc., have adopted a prospective payment system (PPS) to control the increasing expenditures [1]. In the past, the payment system for health insurance has worked on a fee-for-service policy, which may have resulted in an incentive to over-supply medical services or cause a supplier-induced demand for medical resources.…”