1988
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/47.3.413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a milk-based food supplement on maternal nutritional status and fetal growth in underweight Chilean women

Abstract: The effects on pregnancy outcome and maternal iron status of powdered milk (PUR) and a milk-based fortified product (V-N) were compared in a group of underweight gravidas. These take-home products were distributed during regular prenatal visits. Women in the V-N group had greater weight gain (12.29 vs 11.31 kg, p less than 0.05) and mean birth weights (3178 vs 3105 g, p less than 0.05) than those in the PUR group. Values for various indicators of maternal Fe status were also higher in the V-N group. Compared w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
2
3

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
73
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Several trials have showed a reduction in mean birth weight with isocaloric-balanced protein supplementation group vs control diet but the results of such trials have been heterogeneous (Kramer, 2003). One study was of particular concern as isocaloric supplementation was associated with an increased risk of a small-for-gestational age infant (RR ¼ 1.35; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.61) (Mardones-Santander et al, 1988), leading to the conclusion that such supplementation may be harmful. Although randomized intervention trials may be needed to further determine the influence of nutritional supplementation on pregnancy outcomes such as body composition as well as birth weight, supplementation may be unethical in some cases and also supplement composition will not accurately reflect natural maternal dietary intake and indeed could modify food choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several trials have showed a reduction in mean birth weight with isocaloric-balanced protein supplementation group vs control diet but the results of such trials have been heterogeneous (Kramer, 2003). One study was of particular concern as isocaloric supplementation was associated with an increased risk of a small-for-gestational age infant (RR ¼ 1.35; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.61) (Mardones-Santander et al, 1988), leading to the conclusion that such supplementation may be harmful. Although randomized intervention trials may be needed to further determine the influence of nutritional supplementation on pregnancy outcomes such as body composition as well as birth weight, supplementation may be unethical in some cases and also supplement composition will not accurately reflect natural maternal dietary intake and indeed could modify food choice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…95 Such interventions have been tried historically in a variety of malnourished and at-risk populations including poor communities in developed countries. 96,97 In 3 studies among Asian women in the United Kingdom and Chile, where the usual maternal energy intake was isocalorically replaced with 10% to 11% protein, [98][99][100] there was no effect on pregnancy outcomes, although there was a trend toward reduced birth weight. Even higher levels of protein supplementation (Ͼ25% of energy) in relatively well-nourished populations failed to show any benefit on pregnancy outcomes and birth weight.…”
Section: Protein Supplementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amino acid-stimulated increases in fetal glucagon, cortisol, and NE may contribute to a shift in substrate oxidation by the fetus from glucose to amino acids. pregnancy; insulin; fetal protein metabolism; fetal growth PREVIOUS ATTEMPTS TO IMPROVE fetal outcomes with use of maternal high-protein supplementation have actually increased the risk for small-for-gestational-age birth and infant mortality (26,36). Similarly, supplementation of pregnant sheep with intravenous amino acids for several days at the end of gestation demonstrated adverse fetal effects, including hypoxia and respiratory and metabolic acidosis (34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%