Effect of a Mammography Screening Decision Aid for Women 75 Years and Older

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Guidelines recommend that women 75 years and older be informed of the benefits and harms of mammography before screening.OBJECTIVE To test the effects of receipt of a paper-based mammography screening decision aid (DA) for women 75 years and older on their screening decisions. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSA cluster randomized clinical trial with clinician as the unit of randomization. All analyses were completed on an intent-to-treat basis. The setting was 11 primary care practices in Massachusetts or North Carolina. Of 1247 eligible women reached, 546 aged 75 to 89 years without breast cancer or dementia who had a mammogram within 24 months but not within 6 months and saw 1 of 137 clinicians (herein referred to as PCPs) from November 3, 2014, to January 26, 2017, participated. A research assistant (RA) administered a previsit questionnaire on each participant's health, breast cancer risk factors, sociodemographic characteristics, and screening intentions. After the visit, the RA administered a postvisit questionnaire on screening intentions and knowledge.INTERVENTIONS Receipt of the DA (DA arm) or a home safety (HS) pamphlet (control arm) before a PCP visit.MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Participants were followed up for 18 months for receipt of mammography screening (primary outcome). To examine the effects of the DA, marginal logistic regression models were fit using generalized estimating equations to allow for clustering by PCP. Adjusted probabilities and risk differences were estimated to account for clustering by PCP. RESULTSOf 546 women in the study, 283 (51.8%) received the DA. Patients in each arm were well matched; their mean (SD) age was 79.8 (3.7) years, 428 (78.4%) were non-Hispanic white, 321 (of 543 [59.1%]) had completed college, and 192 (35.2%) had less than a 10-year life expectancy. After 18 months, 9.1% (95% CI, 1.2%-16.9%) fewer women in the DA arm than in the control arm had undergone mammography screening (51.3% vs 60.4%; adjusted risk ratio, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95; P = .006). Women in the DA arm were more likely than those in the control arm to rate their screening intentions lower from previsit to postvisit (69 of 283 [adjusted %, 24.5%] vs 47 of 263 [adjusted %, 15.3%]), to be more knowledgeable about the benefits and harms of screening (86 [adjusted %, 25.5%] vs 32 [adjusted %, 11.7%]), and to have a documented discussion about mammography with their PCP (146 [adjusted %, 47.4%] vs 111 [adjusted %, 38.9%]). Almost all women in the DA arm (94.9%) would recommend the DA. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCEProviding women 75 years and older with a mammography screening DA before a PCP visit helps them make more informed screening decisions and leads to fewer women choosing to be screened, suggesting that the DA may help reduce overscreening.

The Challenges and Opportunities for Shared Decision Making Highlighted by COVID-19

“… 39 , 47 Incorporating advocacy groups and other key stakeholders in developing SDM can provide broad engagement and balance it with evidence-based discussion and framing. 48 Although risks of social media cannot be underestimated, VSDM may be a means to provide ways for people to maintain their independence while also interacting with health care providers and rebuilding or preserving social networks.…”

Primary care provider perspectives on screening mammography in older women: A qualitative study

“…These disparate levels of patient empowerment may contribute to the differences that have been observed in rates of screening mammography utilization based on race and insurance status ( Martires et al, 2014 , Rikard et al, 2016 ). Our findings indicate that the implementation of decision tools, such as those developed by Schonberg et al, 2019 , Schonberg et al, 2020 , Talking to Patients about Breast Cancer Screening, 2020 in clinical practice could be vital in ensuring all patients are able to make informed decisions about their care and thus empower them to participate in the shared decision-making process ( Kadivar et al, 2014 ).…”

A Strategy to Prepare Primary Care Clinicians for Discussing Stopping Cancer Screening With Adults Older Than 75 Years

“…The study used a quasi-experimental study design; therefore, changes in screening intentions could be due to secular changes. Also, the study examined the intervention’s effect on screening intentions and not the actual screening; however, lower screening intentions have previously been found to be associated with lower screening rates ( 44 ).…”