2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a magnetic pulse on orientation behavior in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental observations that magnetic orientation depends on the polarity of the ambient magnetic field in salmon ( Quinn et al 1981 ), subterranean mole-rats ( Marhold et al 1997 ), honey bees ( Kirschvink and Kobayashi-Kirschvink 1991 ), and bats ( Wang et al 2007 ) is consistent with a mechanism based on single-domain magnetite. Furthermore, effects of a strong (100–500 mT) but brief (0.1–5 ms) magnetic pulse (with the potential to change the axis of magnetization of permanent magnetic particles) on magnetic orientation in honeybees ( Kirschvink and Kobayashi-Kirschvink 1991 ), arthropods ( Ernst and Lohmann 2016 ), fish ( Fitak et al 2020 ), turtles ( Irwin and Lohmann 2005 ), birds ( Wiltschko et al 1994 ), mole-rats ( Marhold et al 1997 ), and bats ( Holland et al 2008 ) have been interpreted to support a ferrimagnetic sensory system in these species. Neither induction of electric fields nor radical-pair mechanisms (see below) are thought to lead to a prolonged effect on animal orientation from magnetic pulses, as observed in these experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental observations that magnetic orientation depends on the polarity of the ambient magnetic field in salmon ( Quinn et al 1981 ), subterranean mole-rats ( Marhold et al 1997 ), honey bees ( Kirschvink and Kobayashi-Kirschvink 1991 ), and bats ( Wang et al 2007 ) is consistent with a mechanism based on single-domain magnetite. Furthermore, effects of a strong (100–500 mT) but brief (0.1–5 ms) magnetic pulse (with the potential to change the axis of magnetization of permanent magnetic particles) on magnetic orientation in honeybees ( Kirschvink and Kobayashi-Kirschvink 1991 ), arthropods ( Ernst and Lohmann 2016 ), fish ( Fitak et al 2020 ), turtles ( Irwin and Lohmann 2005 ), birds ( Wiltschko et al 1994 ), mole-rats ( Marhold et al 1997 ), and bats ( Holland et al 2008 ) have been interpreted to support a ferrimagnetic sensory system in these species. Neither induction of electric fields nor radical-pair mechanisms (see below) are thought to lead to a prolonged effect on animal orientation from magnetic pulses, as observed in these experiments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, geomagnetic storm conditions are known to disrupt circadian biochemical processes which are believed to be mediated through melatonin and cryptochrome (Close 2012;Krylov 2017). Simulated geomatic storms alter the behaviour of fish (Fitak et al 2020) and crabs (Muraveiko et al 2013) and have been implicated in the mass stranding of cetaceans (Pulkkinen et al 2020;Zellar et al 2021). There are a number of studies that document developmental effects on fish embryos if exposures occur during early developmental stages; using rudd as a model, researchers have documented reductions in condition indices and morphological abnormalities (Krylov et al 2017 which may be a result of alterations in digestive function (Golovanova et al 2015).…”
Section: Limnic Eruptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years it was discovered that animals align their bodies along the Earth's geomagnetic alignment (GMF, [1,2]), but remains one of the most enigmatic of animal senses [3]. These magnetoreception capabilities and mechanisms are attributed mostly to biogenic magnetite [4,5], to magnetic polarity in birds [6], or is based upon blue-light dependent receptors (cryptochromes) located within eyes, proposes the coupling of magnetic sensing with vision (radical pair hypothesis, [7]), in which both magnetic inclination and polarity play an important role [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%