2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.12.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a low-pressure plasma treatment on water vapor diffusivity and permeability of poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) and polyethylene films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This increase may be due to the observed changes in morphology (increase in roughness) as opposed to an increase in the hydrophobicity of the film surface. In related studies (Marais and others ; Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ), treatments with a microwave‐induced, low‐pressure tetrafluoromethane plasma and an RF‐induced low‐pressure O 2 ‐plasma increased the water contact angles of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) and polyethylene films and polytetrafluoroethylene films, respectively. The researchers suggested that the observed increases in contact angle were resulted from increases in average surface roughness due to CPT‐induced etching (Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This increase may be due to the observed changes in morphology (increase in roughness) as opposed to an increase in the hydrophobicity of the film surface. In related studies (Marais and others ; Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ), treatments with a microwave‐induced, low‐pressure tetrafluoromethane plasma and an RF‐induced low‐pressure O 2 ‐plasma increased the water contact angles of poly(ethylene‐co‐vinyl alcohol) and polyethylene films and polytetrafluoroethylene films, respectively. The researchers suggested that the observed increases in contact angle were resulted from increases in average surface roughness due to CPT‐induced etching (Vandencasteele and others ; Carbone and others ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…2. EFG prepared by the combined process of microwave irradiation and ultrasonication showed extremely weak peaks at 3,300, 1,240, and 870 cm 21 , which indicate hydroxyl group, CAOH and epoxy groups, respectively [11,22]. This indicates that the characteristic functional groups disappeared with the microwave irradiation treatment and EFG is relatively hydrophobic [10,11].…”
Section: Characterization Of the Nanocomposite Filmsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The contact angle measurements for each treatment were repeated several times to obtain a maximum deviation of 2°. The surface energy components were calculated using Owens method [23].…”
Section: Cmc Surface Tension and Surface Free Energy Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%