2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11743-013-1496-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a Hydrophilic Head Group on Krafft Temperature, Surface Activities and Rheological Behaviors of Erucyl Amidobetaines

Abstract: Ultra‐long‐chain amidobetaine surfactants have become one of the hot topics recently, but the influence of the hydrophilic head group on the aggregation behaviors and the correlation between surface activities and thickening ability have been less documented. In this work, comparative studies on the effect of the hydrophilic group on Krafft temperature (TK), surface activities and rheological behaviors of erucyl amidobetaines with sulfonate, hydroxyl‐sulfonate or carboxylate were examined. Compared to the sulf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
51
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Log CMC decreases with the increasing alkyl chain length and the B value was 0.35, which was lower than those of sulfobetaine surfactants C n SB (B ¼ 0.44 or B ¼ 0.48). 32 The hydroxyl group in the spacer group enhances the solubility of hydroxypropyl sulfobetaine, as the hydrophilicity increases through hydrogen bond formation between the hydroxyl group and the water molecules. The difference in molecular structure between C n SB and C n HSB is the spacer groups in the polar group, i.e.…”
Section: Surface Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Log CMC decreases with the increasing alkyl chain length and the B value was 0.35, which was lower than those of sulfobetaine surfactants C n SB (B ¼ 0.44 or B ¼ 0.48). 32 The hydroxyl group in the spacer group enhances the solubility of hydroxypropyl sulfobetaine, as the hydrophilicity increases through hydrogen bond formation between the hydroxyl group and the water molecules. The difference in molecular structure between C n SB and C n HSB is the spacer groups in the polar group, i.e.…”
Section: Surface Tensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to NMR and FTIR data, both fresh and aged samples of EASB‐1a and EASB‐1b exhibited similar peak patterns, which revealed excellent heat stabilities of the surfactants. We emphasize here the structure analysis of the aged sample of EASB‐1b in DW as an example (Table ) (Wang et al, ). The data for SW and FW is given in supplementary materials (Figures S1‐S6).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two methylene carbons directly attached to quaternary nitrogen [-CH 2 -N ? -(CH 3 ) 2 -CH 2 -] appeared at d 62.26 and d 62.83 and amide carbonyl group (-CH 2 -C=O-NH) resonated at d 174.60 [18,23,24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%