2022
DOI: 10.1097/jcn.0000000000000911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a Home-Based Mobile Health App Intervention on Physical Activity Levels in Patients With Heart Failure

Abstract: Background: The use of mobile health applications (apps) is an effective strategy in supporting patients' self-management of heart failure (HF) in home settings, but it remains unclear whether they can be used to reduce sedentary behaviors and increase overall physical activity levels. Aim: The aims of this study were to determine the effect of an 8-week home-based mobile health app intervention on physical activity levels and to assess its effects on symptom burden and health-related quality of life. Method: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(237 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Five ( 17 , 19 , 23 , 28 , 29 ) studies involving 1,337 patients reported healthy life-related quality using the SF-36 scale. There was no statistical heterogeneity among the studies ( I 2 = 25.9%, P = 0.249), so the fixed effect model was adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Five ( 17 , 19 , 23 , 28 , 29 ) studies involving 1,337 patients reported healthy life-related quality using the SF-36 scale. There was no statistical heterogeneity among the studies ( I 2 = 25.9%, P = 0.249), so the fixed effect model was adopted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We were concerned that the randomization process of five trials was bias since these trials did not provide clear information on the strategies used to achieve randomization and/or allocation concealment (Clark et al, 2015;Otsu & Moriyama, 2011;Redeker et al, 2022;Saleh et al, 2022;Yu, Chair, et al, 2015); moreover, Redeker et al (2022) were reported to have a statistically significant difference in one key baseline characteristic between groups. Nine articles were considered to have some concerns of bias in terms of the deviations from the intended intervention domain due to the usage of improper analytic strategies or vague information on the analyses (İlaslan & Özer, 2021;Jiang et al, 2021;Leavitt et al, 2020;Otsu & Moriyama, 2011;Redeker et al, 2022;Sadeghi Akbari et al, 2019;Saleh et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2017;Yu, Chair, et al, 2015). We are also concerned about the risk in measurement of the outcome domain for all the studies as double blinding is impossible in these studies and thus may affect the subjective outcome assessment.…”
Section: Quality Appraisal Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comfort and familiarity of a home setting encourage patients to adhere more effectively to their rehabilitation regimen, consequently leading to improved health outcomes. In addition, a series of studies have demonstrated that home‐based cardiac rehabilitation can enhance exercise endurance and quality of life, promote mental health, and decrease readmission rates in patients with chronic heart failure (Chen, Wang, et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2023). However, these benefits depend on patients' long‐term adherence to home‐based cardiac rehabilitation exercises.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%