2021
DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1890329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a genetically engineered interferon-alpha versus traditional interferon-alpha in the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19: a randomised clinical trial

Abstract: Background There are few effective therapies for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon the outbreak of the pandemic. To compare the effectiveness of a novel genetically engineered recombinant super-compound interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional interferon-alpha added to baseline antiviral agents (lopinavir–ritonavir or umifenovir) for the treatment of moderate-to-severe COVID-19. Method In this multicenter randomized (1:1) trial, patients hospitalized with moderate-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This treatment regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes, including cough-relief, CTimaging, and vRNA negativity, altogether favoring an early discharge from hospitalization (144). Another Phase-II clinical trial (ChiCTR2000029638) was conducted on moderate to severe COVID-19 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Recombinant Super-Compound Interferon (rSIFN-co) versus traditional nebulized IFNa-2b, alongside standard antivirals (LPV/r or Umifenovir) (145). The trial observed that cotreatment with rSIFN-co was safer and more efficacious than traditional IFNa-2b for treating moderate to severe COVID-19, warranting further clinical trials of rSIFN, alone or in combination with other antiviral agents.…”
Section: Other Ifnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This treatment regimen significantly improved clinical outcomes, including cough-relief, CTimaging, and vRNA negativity, altogether favoring an early discharge from hospitalization (144). Another Phase-II clinical trial (ChiCTR2000029638) was conducted on moderate to severe COVID-19 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Recombinant Super-Compound Interferon (rSIFN-co) versus traditional nebulized IFNa-2b, alongside standard antivirals (LPV/r or Umifenovir) (145). The trial observed that cotreatment with rSIFN-co was safer and more efficacious than traditional IFNa-2b for treating moderate to severe COVID-19, warranting further clinical trials of rSIFN, alone or in combination with other antiviral agents.…”
Section: Other Ifnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors concluded that the rhIFN-α strictly protected medical staff with the augmented safeguards. A randomized multicenter clinical trial was conducted by Li et al [92] to evaluate the efficacy of recombinant super compound-interferon (rSIFN-co) with traditional IFN in COVID-19 treatment, and the rSINF group showed better clinical improvement time (rSIFN = 11.5 days, IFN-alpha = 14 days), clinical improvement rate (rSIFN = 93.5%, IFN-alpha = 77.1%), radiological improvement time (rSIFN = 8 days, IFN-alpha = 10 days), and viral shedding time (rSIFN = 7 days, IFN-alpha = 10 days). Another randomized control trial was reported wherein IFN-alpha 2b exerted greater efficacy in the duration of hospitalization and viral clearance [53].…”
Section: Interferons (Ifns)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 114 eligible studies 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ,…”
Section: Tableunclassified