2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cep.2008.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of a draft tube on gas–liquid jet boundaries in a gas–solid fluidized bed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can either be achieved by performing dedicated experiments or detailed numerical simulations. The experimental studies reported in literature for gassolid fluidized beds include: dynamic pressure drop analysis [6], temperature measurements near the injection point, X-ray imaging [7] and triboelectric probe measurements [8]. However, these techniques either provide point information or possess a low resolution with complex image post processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can either be achieved by performing dedicated experiments or detailed numerical simulations. The experimental studies reported in literature for gassolid fluidized beds include: dynamic pressure drop analysis [6], temperature measurements near the injection point, X-ray imaging [7] and triboelectric probe measurements [8]. However, these techniques either provide point information or possess a low resolution with complex image post processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be achieved by performing detailed experimental studies addressing both the hydrodynamics and thermal aspects. The experimental studies reported in literature include: pressure drop analysis, temperature measurements near the injection point or in the whole water atomized gas–solid fluidized bed, fiber optical probe measurements of solids concentration and particle velocity under dry and wet conditions, and triboelectric probe measurements . McDougall et al measured the dynamic pressure signals generated during liquid injection (water, 1‐propanol, and 1‐butanol) to identify the bed fluidity and the particle agglomerate formation in a fluidized bed with a two‐fluid nozzle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these techniques often possess a low resolution with a complex image post processing. By considering this, Briens et al have extended triboelectric effect (i.e., electrostatic charges generated during particles collision and friction with particle and metal surface) measurement technique to study the penetration and expansion of a gas–liquid spray in a fluidized bed through a triboelectric current measurement. Even though this technique provides an nonintrusive illustration of free moisture, quantitative data such as particle velocity and porosity are difficult to obtain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Features Temperature probes [1,9,12,22] • Fast and robust • Invasive • Sticking, difficult interpretation [9] and [12] • Mostly employed for time averages Suction probes [9,14] • Mainly for time averaged gas composition profiles • Invasive • Potential for bias by sticking liquid Pressure probes [2,21,20,36] • Common indicator of change of fluidization regime [2,21,20] • Other techniques required to confirm interpretation [20,36] Tribo-electric probes [3,6,26] • Invasive • Sensitive to local hydrodynamics the infrared, and presents a method to detect the dense emulsion phase using the camera detecting visual light, to ensure proper application of the calibration. Therefore, this method, unlike that by [25], also works for wide temperature distributions in the solid phase.…”
Section: Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In absense of an estimate for T w , equation (5) cannot be evaluated. However, substituting the assumption T w = T b into equation (5) yields equation (6).…”
Section: Interference Of a Window In Thermographymentioning
confidence: 99%