Effect of a 6-week running sprint interval training protocol on serum meteorin-like hormone, insulin resistance, and body composition in overweight adolescents

Alizadeh, Hamid; Safarzade, Alireza

doi:10.23736/s0025-7826.18.03426-9

Cited by 5 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Low-volume 90–100% HR max 4 weeks 15–20 min 3 times/week Evangelista et al [ 55 ] 7 Brazil 25 males and females Active 28.3 ± 6.8 Passive 20 sets of 30 s all-out exercise and 30 s of passive recovery between sets. High-volume All out exercise 6 weeks 20 min 3 times/week Alizadeh and Safarzade [ 51 ] 7 Spain 20 adolescent boys Active 18.0 ± 1.5 Passive 3 × 10 repetitions of 30 s of aerobic exercises all out (cycling, rowing, and running) interspersed by 30 s of rest. High-volume 90% HR max 6 weeks 10–20 min 3 times/week Moro et al [ 56 ] 7 Italy 20 healthy young adults Inactive 22.1 ± 1.9 Passive HIIRT: first set of 6 repetitions at 80% 1RM followed by a 20″ rest; then, subjects were asked to lift the same weight until failure (habitually 2 or 3 repetitions) followed by another 20″ rest period with repetitions to fatigue.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 4 summarizes the 13 studies that examined the effects of long-term interval training interspersed with passive recovery on measures of physical fitness and physiological parameters in both trained and untrained youth and adult individuals. Six studies [ 4 , 26 , 47 – 50 ] involved trained individuals and the seven remaining studies comprised untrained subjects [ 51 – 57 ]. Irrespective of the type of interval training or exercise protocol (type of exercise, duration, or intensity of exercise training), eleven out of 13 studies reported increases in measures of physical fitness (e.g., maximal aerobic velocity [MAV], Yo-Yo running test, jumping) and physiological parameters (e.g., VO 2max , lactate threshold, blood pressures) in both trained (effect size for single studies: 0.13 < d < 3.27, small to very large) and untrained adults as well as trained youth (effect size: 0.17 < d < 4.19, small to very large).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Nine studies [ 4 , 26 , 47 – 50 , 58 , 59 , 63 ] were of high quality and included both sexes [ 4 , 26 , 47 – 50 , 58 , 59 ] and reported that passive recovery had a large positive effect on VO 2max and physical fitness using aerobic exercise training at 90–100% of VO 2max . Eleven studies used aerobic interval training as an intervention [ 4 , 26 , 47 – 51 , 53 , 54 , 56 , 57 ], while another two studies used either sprint interval training [ 52 ] or repeated sprint ability as interventions [ 55 ]. Most included studies showed large effect sizes of passive recovery during long-term interval exercise training on VO 2max .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Our analysis indicated small improvements in measures of physical fitness after long-term interval exercise training with passive recovery in healthy untrained individuals. Indeed, the seven included studies [ 51 , 52 , 54 ] were of high quality, included both sexes, and the population was restricted to healthy individuals [ 52 , 54 – 57 ], overweight, and obese [ 51 , 53 ] individuals, aged 18–38 years old. Three studies with passive recovery reported slight positive training-induced changes in VO 2max [ 52 – 54 , 56 ], jump tests [ 55 – 57 ], muscle strength [ 55 ], and body composition [ 52 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Three studies with passive recovery reported slight positive training-induced changes in VO 2max [ 52 – 54 , 56 ], jump tests [ 55 – 57 ], muscle strength [ 55 ], and body composition [ 52 ]. Researchers from one study [ 51 ] reported a very large positive impact on the body mass index in overweight participants aged 18.0 ± 1.5 years. after a 30 s/30 s training program with a passive recovery.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Effects of Passive or Active Recovery Regimes Applied During Long-Term Interval Training on Physical Fitness in Healthy Trained and Untrained Individuals: A Systematic Review

Zouhal,

Abderrahman,

Jayavel

et al. 2024

Sports Med - Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Intermittent exercise programs characterized through intensive exercise bouts alternated with passive or active recovery (i.e., interval training), have been proven to enhance measures of cardiorespiratory fitness. However, it is unresolved which recovery type (active or passive) applied during interval training results in larger performance improvements. Objectives This systematic review aimed to summarize recent evidence on the effects of passive or active recovery following long-term interval exercise training on measures of physical fitness and physiological adaptations in healthy trained and untrained individuals. The study protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (OSF) platform (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/9BUEY). Methods We searched nine databases including the grey literature (Academic Search Elite, CINAHL, ERIC, Open Access Theses and Dissertations, Open Dissertations, PsycINFO, PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus) from inception until February 2023. Key terms as high-intensity interval training, recovery mode, passive or active recover were used. A systematic review rather than a meta-analysis was performed, as a large number of outcome parameters would have produced substantial heterogeneity. Results After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, 24 studies were eligible for inclusion in our final analysis. Thirteen studies examined the effects of interval training interspersed with passive recovery regimes on physical fitness and physiological responses in trained (6 studies) and untrained (7 studies) individuals. Eleven out of 13 studies reported significant improvements in physical fitness (e.g., maximal aerobic velocity (MAV), Yo-Yo running test, jump performance) and physiological parameters (e.g., maximal oxygen uptake [VO2max], lactate threshold, blood pressure) in trained (effect sizes from single studies: 0.13 < Cohen’s d < 3.27, small to very large) and untrained individuals (effect sizes: 0.17 < d < 4.19, small to very large) despite the type of interval training or exercise dosage (frequency, intensity, time, type). Two studies were identified that examined the effects of passive recovery applied during interval training in young female basketball (15.1 ± 1.1 years) and male soccer players (14.2 ± 0.5 years). Both studies showed positive effects of passive recovery on VO2max, countermovement jump performance, and the Yo-Yo running test. Eleven studies examined the effects of interval training interspersed with active recovery methods on physical fitness and physiological parameters in trained (6 studies) and untrained individuals (5 studies). Despite the type of interval training or exercise dosage, nine out of eleven studies reported significant increases in measures of physical fitness (e.g., MAV) and physiological parameters (e.g., VO2max, blood pressures) in trained (effect sizes from single studies: 0.13 < d < 1.29, small to very large) and untrained individuals (effect sizes: 0.19 < d < 3.29, small to very large). There was no study available that examined the effects of active recovery on physical fitness and physiological responses in youth. Conclusions The results of this systematic review show that interval training interspersed with active or passive recovery regimes have the potential to improve measures of physical fitness and physiology outcomes in trained and untrained adults and trained youth. That is, the applied recovery type seems not to affect the outcomes. Nonetheless, more research is needed on the effects of recovery type on measures of physical fitness and physiological adaptations in youth.

show abstract