1961
DOI: 10.3181/00379727-107-26537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of 6-Mercaptopurine on Homograft Reaction in Rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1969
1969

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences between our study and that of Hoyer et d. probably reflect species differences in the response to, or the metabolism of, 6-MP; thus, in daily doses of 1 2 mg/kg, 6-MP was toxic to the rabbit and abolished all signs of EAE during drug administration, whereas daily doses up to 50 mg/kg for 15 days were nontoxic in the present study and complete suppression of clinical disease in all animals was not achieved. Other workers have also noted the relative resistance of rats to the toxic effects of 6-MP (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The differences between our study and that of Hoyer et d. probably reflect species differences in the response to, or the metabolism of, 6-MP; thus, in daily doses of 1 2 mg/kg, 6-MP was toxic to the rabbit and abolished all signs of EAE during drug administration, whereas daily doses up to 50 mg/kg for 15 days were nontoxic in the present study and complete suppression of clinical disease in all animals was not achieved. Other workers have also noted the relative resistance of rats to the toxic effects of 6-MP (23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There are numerous studies in the literature of the preventive effect of 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) in the primary and secondary immune responses in skin and renal homografts, protein antigens, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis, and intramyocardial injections of streptococci (Schwartz, Stack, and Dameshek, 1958;Meeker, Condie, Weiner, Varco, and Good, 1959;Schwartz andDameshek, 1959, 1960;Schwartz, Eisner, and Dameshek, 1959;Calne, 1960;Hoyer, Condie, and Good, 1960;Thomas, Morton, Crane, and Gardner, 1961;Zukoski, Lee, and Hume, 1961;Pierce and Varco, 1962;Laufer, Ginsburg, Gery, and Davies, 1963).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%