Effect of 5-Line Signs in the Prediction of Staging, Progression, and Prognosis of Peripheral Lung Carcinoma: Preliminary Observation Report

Abstract

Background The single line of the normal interlobar fissure shown on a thin section image can be reconstructed as a 5-line sign on axial maximal intensity projection. The line between the lung nodule and the pleura is called the pleural tail sign on thin image. On the axial maximal intensity projection, it can also be reconstructed as the 5-line sign or fewer than 5 lines. Objective This study aimed to observe the effect of 5-line signs in staging, progression, and prognosis of peripheral lung carcinoma. Materials and Methods This study included 132 patients with peripheral lung carcinoma. Among these patients, 93 were men and 39 were women, with an age range of 27 to 82 years and a lung nodule range of 0.98 to 8.75 cm. Maximal intensity projection was reconstructed based on 1.0 or 1.25 mm of thin-slice images in multislice spiral computed tomography. Five-line signs on the margin of the nodule (mass) were observed and were classified into grades 1 to 4 according to the sharpness of the 5-line signs. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the sharpness of the 5-line signs was correlated with N and TNM staging of peripheral lung carcinoma (P = 0.012, P = 0.016). The lower the sharpness of the 5-line signs, the greater the number of cases of progression of the tumor (P < 0.001), and thus the higher the mortality rate and the lower the survival rate (P = 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of predicting tumor progression were 56.3% and 93.3%, and those of tumor prognosis were 61.1% and 82.4%, respectively. Conclusions The sharpness of the 5-line signs has certain effects on the prediction of invasion, progression, and prognosis of lung carcinoma, particularly of small lung cancer (≤3.0 cm).

Detection of Changes in CEA and ProGRP Levels in BALF of Patients with Peripheral Lung Cancer and the Relationship with CT Signs

“…Peripheral lung cancer is difficult to diagnose because of the late onset of clinical symptoms and the small size of the tumour in the early stage, which can easily be overlooked by clinicians and patients, thus delaying the best time for treatment and affecting the therapeutic effect [ 1 ]. Therefore, it is important to choose a safe, effective, and convenient test to improve the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer in order to improve the prognosis of patients.…”