Effect Evaluation of Comfort Nursing Materials Assisted Nursing for Patients with Advanced Malignant Tumor

Abstract

In order to explore the effect of comfort care on patients with advanced malignant tumors assisted by bioceramics, 82 patients with advanced malignant tumors admitted to a cancer hospital were selected as the research object control group: 26 males and 15 females and the observation group: 25 males and 16 females. The control group was given routine care, and the observation group was given comfort care on the basis of the control group. The quality of life (QLQ-C30 functional scale) and nursing satisfaction before and after nursing were compared between the two groups. The results of the study indicate that after care, the physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social, general health, and symptom scores of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group, the nursing satisfaction degree of the observation group was 97.56%, which was significantly higher than that of the control group of 82.93%, and the difference was statistically significant ( P < 0.05 ). Comfortable care has a definite effect on the care of patients with advanced malignant tumors; it can improve the overall comfort and satisfaction of patients, effectively reduce adverse events, and improve the quality of life of patients.

Retracted: Effect Evaluation of Comfort Nursing Materials Assisted Nursing for Patients with Advanced Malignant Tumor

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”