Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2015
DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2015-103089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect evaluation of a self-management programme for employees with complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Dutch Trial Registration number NTR 3816.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results so far have indicated improved self-efficacy for staying at work, but no significant impact on RTW or work retention [41]. Another approach has focused on improving support in the workplace, through trained supervisors or a non-medical peer advocate, who provide reassurance, facilitate accommodations, and problem-solving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results so far have indicated improved self-efficacy for staying at work, but no significant impact on RTW or work retention [41]. Another approach has focused on improving support in the workplace, through trained supervisors or a non-medical peer advocate, who provide reassurance, facilitate accommodations, and problem-solving.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28][29] 4. A psychosocial intervention; 30,32 psychosocial in combination with exercise; 31.33 workplace; 34 or conventional clinical management. 35…”
Section: Trial Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 19 studies included, 10 studies were randomised controlled trials 25–34. Eight studies used a prospective design where educational management strategies were tested using one35–39 or two groups 40–42.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The content of the educational set-up and content varied between the included studies where three themes for methods of delivery emerged: written material in a hard copy (eg, pamphlet or book),25 27 29 32–34 36 41 43 electronic delivery29 30 38 39 or a teacher–student setting (eg, lecture or face-to-face teaching/mentoring) 25 26 28 31 35 37 40 42. Some of these included studies employed a mixed approach where education was supplemented by a more active approach (see Potential influence of delivery method section and table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation