2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect estimate comparison between the prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) and parallel group study designs: A systematic review

Abstract: Prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA), a case-only design introduced in 1996, has been increasingly used to identify unintentional drug effects, and has potential applications as a hypothesis-testing and a hypothesis-generating method, due to its easy application and effective control of time-invariant confounders. The aim of this study is to systematically compare effect estimates from the PSSA to effect estimates from conventional observational parallel group study designs, to assess the validity an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They will provide event rates for events resulting in hospital admissions (serious adverse reactions), or that may have therapeutic markers (such as the use of antidepressant drugs to identify depression) using prescription symmetry analysis [85][86][87].…”
Section: Exposure-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They will provide event rates for events resulting in hospital admissions (serious adverse reactions), or that may have therapeutic markers (such as the use of antidepressant drugs to identify depression) using prescription symmetry analysis [85][86][87].…”
Section: Exposure-based Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the influence of confounding might be mitigated with this design, resulting in estimates close to those of the recent meta‐analysis. However, it is also possible that the self‐controlled study design provide more‐conservative estimates than conventional comparator designs, as demonstrated by Idema et al 12 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, few studies have explicitly compared the utility of the self-controlled study design for pharmacoepidemiological studies without an active comparator medication and that of non-user-comparator cohort study designs when based on a medical information database. 12 This study illustrates the utility of the self-controlled design in pharmacoepidemiological studies by comparing the results of a nonuser-comparator cohort study design and a self-controlled study design. As an example study, we assessed the cardiovascular risk posed by varenicline, a smoking cessation medication used in Japan, among current smokers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The performance of ARM was compared with that of SSA [ 18 , 19 ]. A proof-of-concept study on SSA was published in 1996, and since then the number of SSA-related articles published per year and the total number of articles are on the rise [ 38 , 39 ]. By using SSA, several ADRs associated with a wide array of organs have been identified [ 20 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%