2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-76651-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect and underlying mechanisms of airborne particulate matter 2.5 (PM2.5) on cultured human corneal epithelial cells

Abstract: Health problems caused by airborne particulate matter with a diameter less than 2.5 (PM2.5), especially in the respiratory system, have become a worldwide problem, but the influence and mechanisms of PM2.5 on the ocular surface have not been sufficiently elucidated. We investigated in vitro the onset and pathogenesis of corneal damage induced by PM2.5. Two types of PM2.5 samples originating from Beijing (designated #28) and the Gobi Desert (designated #30) were added to the culture medium of immortalized cultu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 18 Some studies have reported that cell damage can be observed by adding PM to cultured corneal epithelial cell lines. 19 21 In the study of diesel exhaust, researchers not only observed the toxicity of diesel exhaust on corneal epithelial cells cultured in vitro, but also confirmed that it can affect the stability of ocular surface structure in a mouse model. 22 , 23 Some scholars try to use PM topical eye drops to observe its effect on the ocular surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“… 18 Some studies have reported that cell damage can be observed by adding PM to cultured corneal epithelial cell lines. 19 21 In the study of diesel exhaust, researchers not only observed the toxicity of diesel exhaust on corneal epithelial cells cultured in vitro, but also confirmed that it can affect the stability of ocular surface structure in a mouse model. 22 , 23 Some scholars try to use PM topical eye drops to observe its effect on the ocular surface.…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In 2020, several authors presented solutions for CRC diagnosis, with varying degrees of detail. Iizuka et al 43 proposed the combination of a Inception-v3 network with a recurrent neural network (RNN) to classify H&E colorectal WSI into non-neoplastic, adenoma and adenocarcinoma. Each slide was divided into patches of pixels (at 20X magnification, with a sliding window of 256 pixels) and assigned to one of the three diagnostic classes.…”
Section: Computational Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…: 87.69%; AUC: 0.90 Korbar et al 40 2017 Polyp classification (6-class): normal, hyperplastic, sessile serrated, traditional serrated, tubular and tubulovillous/villous 697 H&E slides (annotated) 811 × 984 px ROIs (mean size); ResNet-152 + argmax of tile class frequency Acc. : 93%; Precision: 89.7%; Recall: 88.3%; F1-score: 88.8% Yoshida et al 38 2017 CRC classification (4-class): unclassifiable, non-neoplastic, adenoma and CA 1068 H&E slides (w/ labelled tissue sections) Tissue sections crop + cytological atypia analysis + structural atypia analysis + overall classification FNR (CA): 9.3%; FNR (adenoma): 0%; FPR: 27.1% Iizuka et al 43 2020 CRC classification (3-class): non-neoplastic, AD and ADC 4536 H&E slides (annotated) + 547 H&E slides from TCGA-COAD collection 512 × 512 px tiles at 20×; Inception-v3 + RNN AUC: 0.962 (ADC), 0.993 (AD); AUC (TCGA-COAD subset): 0.982 (ADC) Song et al 46 2020 Colorectal adenoma detection (normal vs adenoma) 411 H&E slides (annotated) + external set: 168 H&E slides 640 × 640 px tiles at 10×; Modified DeepLab-v2 + 15th largest pixel probability AUC: 0.92; Acc. (external set): >90% Wei et al 45 2020 Polyp classification (5-class): Normal, hyperplastic, tubular, tubulovillous/villous, sessile serrated 508 H&E slides (annotated) + external set: 238 H&E slides 224 × 224 px tiles at 40×; ResNet models ensemble + hierarchical classification Acc.…”
Section: Computational Pathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ocular changes are similar to the symptoms of dry eye in humans [ 12 ]. More recently, a few studies have suggested that exposure to PM 2.5 promotes cytotoxicity, cellular organelle damage, inflammation and wound healing suppression in corneal epithelial and conjunctival epithelial cells [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Nevertheless, most studies on the biological and toxicological risks of PM 2.5 have focused on other organs, such as the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, while studies on the influence of PM 2.5 on the ocular system are still in the early stage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%