2010
DOI: 10.1590/s1808-86942010000500020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeitos da radiação acústica na obtenção dos limiares ósseos

Abstract: Acoust ic radiation is the sound energy escape from a bone vibrator that may be detected by air conduction mechanisms. The presence of acoustic radiation may result in an unreal bone conduction threshold, promoting an unreal air/bone gap in the high frequencies.Aim: aim to analyze the acoustic radiation effect on the extension of air/bone gap at 2,000, 3,000 and 4,000 Hz.Materials and Method: our clinical and experimental study had a sample of 101 individuals, who matched inclusion criteria: to have an air/bon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…9,11 One reason for this could be the variability of bone conduction thresholds obtained via mastoid placement of the bone conductor during manual PTA as a result of acoustic radiation which could result in better than actual BC thresholds. 22,23 Another factor influencing the differences found between BC thresholds obtained via the two methods is the forehead placement of the bone conductor in AMTAS as compared to the ipsilateral mastoid placement of the bone conductor in conventional PTA. Various studies have shown that the two placement methods result in differences in the bone conduction thresholds obtained.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11 One reason for this could be the variability of bone conduction thresholds obtained via mastoid placement of the bone conductor during manual PTA as a result of acoustic radiation which could result in better than actual BC thresholds. 22,23 Another factor influencing the differences found between BC thresholds obtained via the two methods is the forehead placement of the bone conductor in AMTAS as compared to the ipsilateral mastoid placement of the bone conductor in conventional PTA. Various studies have shown that the two placement methods result in differences in the bone conduction thresholds obtained.…”
Section: Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%